header
Image from OpenLibrary

Comparative study between three ports sleeve gastrectomy and conventional sleeve gastrectomy / Ahmed Samir Fouad Tammam ; Supervised Hisham Ahmed Aboueisha , Ahmed Abdelaziz Mohamed , Ahmed Mohammed Abdelsalam

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Ahmed Samir Fouad Tammam , 2021Description: 47 P. : charts ; 25cmOther title:
  • دراسة مقارنة بين تكميم المعدة ثلاثى الفتحات وتكميم المعدة التقليدى [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of General Surgery Summary: Background Bariatric surgery is a treatment for morbid obesity. Different surgical procedures have been described in order to obtain excess weight loss (EWL), but currently laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is the most commonly performed procedure throughout the world. Reducing abdominal wall trauma and increasing the aesthetic result are important goals for all bariatric surgeons.The aim of the study is to assess and compare the practicability and efficacy of laparoscopic three-port sleeve gastrectomy (3PSG) and conventional laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Method A prospective randomized comparative study between patients underwent 3PSG (group 1) and conventional LSG (group 2), each containing 50 patients after application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results Mean operation time was longer in group1 (50±4.38 min vs. 46.04±3.64 min, p < 0.001), but patient satisfaction was better in the three-trocar sleeve gastrectomy group. (p < 0.001) The median VAS was 3.38±1.38 and 3.68±1.45 in group 1 &2 respectively (p > 0.05). EBWL% was similar in both groups.There were no intraoperative complications or major complication as leakage or bleeding in both groups. No cases needed an extra port in 3PSG group.There was no clinically apparent trocar site hernia
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Date due Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.11.14.Ph.D.2021.Ah.C (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110084578000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.11.14.Ph.D.2021.Ah.C (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 84578.CD Not for loan 01020110084578000

Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of General Surgery

Background Bariatric surgery is a treatment for morbid obesity. Different surgical procedures have been described in order to obtain excess weight loss (EWL), but currently laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is the most commonly performed procedure throughout the world. Reducing abdominal wall trauma and increasing the aesthetic result are important goals for all bariatric surgeons.The aim of the study is to assess and compare the practicability and efficacy of laparoscopic three-port sleeve gastrectomy (3PSG) and conventional laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Method A prospective randomized comparative study between patients underwent 3PSG (group 1) and conventional LSG (group 2), each containing 50 patients after application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results Mean operation time was longer in group1 (50±4.38 min vs. 46.04±3.64 min, p < 0.001), but patient satisfaction was better in the three-trocar sleeve gastrectomy group. (p < 0.001) The median VAS was 3.38±1.38 and 3.68±1.45 in group 1 &2 respectively (p > 0.05). EBWL% was similar in both groups.There were no intraoperative complications or major complication as leakage or bleeding in both groups. No cases needed an extra port in 3PSG group.There was no clinically apparent trocar site hernia

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.