header
Image from OpenLibrary

Effect of manual expiratory rib cage compression on blood gases in mechanically ventilated patients / Asmaa Mostafa Abdelkader Mahmoud ; Supervised Awny Fouad Rahmy , Heba Ali Abdelghaffar , Islam Reda Mohamed

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Asmaa Mostafa Abdelkader Mahmoud , 2021Description: 90 P . : charts , facsmilies ; 25cmOther title:
  • تأثير ضغط الصدر اليدوى على غازات الدم فى مرضى التنفس الصناعى [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Physical Therapy for Cardiopulmonary and Geriatrics Disorders Summary: Background: Manual expiratory rib cage compression technique is one of the most practiced chest physiotherapy technique in mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care unit Aim of the study: to detect the effect of manual rib cage compression on blood gases in mechanically ventilated patients Patient and Methods: forty adult patients on pressure controlled mechanical ventilation from both gender participated in this study , their ages ranged from 40 to 50 years old and randomly distributed into two equal groups A (control group ) and B (Study group). Group (A): twenty mechanically ventilated patients received traditional physiotherapy (positioning, percussion, vibration and suctioning) Group (B): twenty mechanically ventilated patients received manual expiratory rib cage compression technique in addition to the same traditional treatment. Each patient received two sessions per day for 3 days, both groups assessed before and after treatment regarding arterial blood gases parameters (PH, SaO2, PaO2, and PaCo2). Results: there were significant increase after treatment in PaO2 and SaO2 compared to before-treatment within control group with improvement percentage 39.65% and 3.15% and study group with improvement percentage 46.85% and 4.80 %. But, no significant differences (P>0.05) between before and after treatment in pH and PCO2 within control group and study group. And Between both groups indicated no significant differences (P>0.05) at before and after treatment in pH, PCO2, PO2, and SaO2 between control group and study group
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Date due Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.21.02.M.Sc.2021.As.E (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110084652000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.21.02.M.Sc.2021.As.E (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 84652.CD Not for loan 01020110084652000

Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Physical Therapy for Cardiopulmonary and Geriatrics Disorders

Background: Manual expiratory rib cage compression technique is one of the most practiced chest physiotherapy technique in mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care unit Aim of the study: to detect the effect of manual rib cage compression on blood gases in mechanically ventilated patients Patient and Methods: forty adult patients on pressure controlled mechanical ventilation from both gender participated in this study , their ages ranged from 40 to 50 years old and randomly distributed into two equal groups A (control group ) and B (Study group). Group (A): twenty mechanically ventilated patients received traditional physiotherapy (positioning, percussion, vibration and suctioning) Group (B): twenty mechanically ventilated patients received manual expiratory rib cage compression technique in addition to the same traditional treatment. Each patient received two sessions per day for 3 days, both groups assessed before and after treatment regarding arterial blood gases parameters (PH, SaO2, PaO2, and PaCo2). Results: there were significant increase after treatment in PaO2 and SaO2 compared to before-treatment within control group with improvement percentage 39.65% and 3.15% and study group with improvement percentage 46.85% and 4.80 %. But, no significant differences (P>0.05) between before and after treatment in pH and PCO2 within control group and study group. And Between both groups indicated no significant differences (P>0.05) at before and after treatment in pH, PCO2, PO2, and SaO2 between control group and study group

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.