header
Local cover image
Local cover image
Image from OpenLibrary

The effect of hyaluronic acid on implant stability after immediate implant placement in anterior and premolar region in systemically healthy patients : Randomized clinical trial / Ibrahim Samy Kalboush ; Supervised Mona Ali Shoeib , Mona Salah Eldeen Darhous

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Ibrahim Samy Kalboush , 2021Description: 146 P. : charts , facsimiles ; 25cmOther title:
  • تأثير حمض الهيالورونيك على ثبات الزرعة فى غرسات الأسنان الفورية فى منطقة الأسنان الأمامية و الضواحك في المرضى غير المصابين بأى مرض عضوى : تجربة سريرية عشوائية [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Online resources: Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Periodontology Summary: Aim: Aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of hyaluronic acid on implant stability, soft tissue healing and post-operative pain after immediate implant placement. Research question: Does topical application of hyaluronic acid with immediate implant placement in systemically healthy patient will provide more implant stability, better soft tissue healing or less post-operative pain than immediate implant placement alone in anterior and premolar region in systemically healthy patients? Methodology: 24 patients indicated for immediate implants were randomly allocated in to 2 equal groups. Intervention group (Immediate implant with topical application of HA) and control group (immediate implant with topical application of placebo gel). implant stability was evaluated at baseline and after 6 months using osstell, soft tissue healing was assessed after 10 days during suture removal using likert scale and pain intensity was assessed at day 0, 2 and 7 after the surgery using visual analogue scale (VAS). Results: The results of this study showed that the mean secondary implant stability was (72.3±4.8) and (71.5±4.3) in the intervention group and control group respectively with no significant difference between both groups (P=0.656).The mean implant stability percent increase was (36.4±8.6) compared to (35.6±8.5) in group B.This was statistically not significant; (p=0.807). The median and range of the soft tissue healing scores was 2 [2-3] for intervention group and 3 [2-3] for control group with no statistically significant difference between both groups (P=0.424). vii Regarding post-operative pain, there was only significant difference at day 2, where the median and range of the VAS scores was 4 [3-6] for intervention group and 6 [5-6] for control group (p= 0.001)
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.08.Ph.D.2021.Ib.E (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110084711000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.08.Ph.D.2021.Ib.E (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 84711.CD Not for loan 01020110084711000
Browsing المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة shelves Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
No cover image available
No cover image available
No cover image available
No cover image available
No cover image available
No cover image available
No cover image available
Cai01.09.08.Ph.D.2021.Az.A Assessment of implant stability in immediate post-extraction implants with and without the application of hyaluronic acid and melatonin mixture : Randomized clinical trial / Cai01.09.08.Ph.D.2021.Gh.E Evaluation of post-extraction socket preservation with camelline versus bovine deproteinized xenograft : A pilot trial / Cai01.09.08.Ph.D.2021.Gh.E Evaluation of post-extraction socket preservation with camelline versus bovine deproteinized xenograft : A pilot trial / Cai01.09.08.Ph.D.2021.Ib.E The effect of hyaluronic acid on implant stability after immediate implant placement in anterior and premolar region in systemically healthy patients : Randomized clinical trial / Cai01.09.08.Ph.D.2021.Ib.E The effect of hyaluronic acid on implant stability after immediate implant placement in anterior and premolar region in systemically healthy patients : Randomized clinical trial / Cai01.09.08.Ph.D.2021.Ma.C Clinical Effectiveness Of Coronally Advanced Flap With Papillary Extended Connective Tissue Graft Versus Connective Tissue Graft In Miller Class Iii Recession : A Randomized Clinical Tria / Cai01.09.08.Ph.D.2021.Ma.C Clinical Effectiveness Of Coronally Advanced Flap With Papillary Extended Connective Tissue Graft Versus Connective Tissue Graft In Miller Class Iii Recession : A Randomized Clinical Tria /

Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Periodontology

Aim: Aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of hyaluronic acid on implant stability, soft tissue healing and post-operative pain after immediate implant placement. Research question: Does topical application of hyaluronic acid with immediate implant placement in systemically healthy patient will provide more implant stability, better soft tissue healing or less post-operative pain than immediate implant placement alone in anterior and premolar region in systemically healthy patients? Methodology: 24 patients indicated for immediate implants were randomly allocated in to 2 equal groups. Intervention group (Immediate implant with topical application of HA) and control group (immediate implant with topical application of placebo gel). implant stability was evaluated at baseline and after 6 months using osstell, soft tissue healing was assessed after 10 days during suture removal using likert scale and pain intensity was assessed at day 0, 2 and 7 after the surgery using visual analogue scale (VAS). Results: The results of this study showed that the mean secondary implant stability was (72.3±4.8) and (71.5±4.3) in the intervention group and control group respectively with no significant difference between both groups (P=0.656).The mean implant stability percent increase was (36.4±8.6) compared to (35.6±8.5) in group B.This was statistically not significant; (p=0.807). The median and range of the soft tissue healing scores was 2 [2-3] for intervention group and 3 [2-3] for control group with no statistically significant difference between both groups (P=0.424). vii Regarding post-operative pain, there was only significant difference at day 2, where the median and range of the VAS scores was 4 [3-6] for intervention group and 6 [5-6] for control group (p= 0.001)

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Local cover image