Complete decongestive therapy versus compression bandaging in advanced secondary lymphedema / Ahmed Mohamed Abdelrauf Mohamed ; Supervised Amal Mohamed Abdelbaky , Eman Mohamed Othman , Hamed Mohamed Kadry
Material type: TextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Ahmed Mohamed Abdelrauf Mohamed , 2021Description: 109 P. : charts , facsimiles ; 25cmOther title:- تأثير العلاج الكامل المزيل للاحتقان مقابل الضمادة الضاغطة في الورم الليمفاوى الثانوى المتقدم [Added title page title]
- Issued also as CD
Item type | Current library | Home library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thesis | قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول | المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة | Cai01.21.07.Ph.D.2021.Ah.C (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Not for loan | 01010110085028000 | |||
CD - Rom | مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم | المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة | Cai01.21.07.Ph.D.2021.Ah.C (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 85028.CD | Not for loan | 01020110085028000 |
Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Physical Therapy for Surgery
Purpose.To compare betweencomplete decongestive therapy (CDT) andcompression bandaging (CB) in patients with advanced secondary lymphedema. Methods. Sixty patients of both genders with upper &lower limb secondary lymphedema (stage II and III) aged from 40 to 55 years old, with body mass index (BMI) less than 35 and duration of illness ranged from 3-9 years were included in the study.They were randomly assigned into two groups of equal numbers. Group A: Thirty patients received CDT (Manual lymph drainage, CB, exercises, and skin care).Group B:Thirty patients received CB.The treatment sessions consisted of twelve sessions, three times per week for a total duration of four weeks.The assessment of limb volume was done using water displacement method and truncated cone volumetric measurements (pre-treatment, after 6 sessions (post-1 treatment) and after 12 sessions (post-2 treatment)). Results.The results showed that there was no significant difference of the mean values of water displacement volumetric measurements and truncated cone mean volumetric values of the "post 1 treatment between both groups (p=0.537, p=0.254) respectively. As well, there was no significant difference of the mean volumetric values of water displacement volumetric measurements and truncated cone mean volumetric values of the "post 2 treatmentbetween both groups (p=0.835, p=0.397) respectively
Issued also as CD
There are no comments on this title.