header
Image from OpenLibrary

Effacicy of flow versus volume incentive spirometer on arterial blood gases in patients with pneumonia / Israa Mohammed Abdelmoneim Youssef ; Supervised Azza Abdelaziz Abdelhady , Mohamed Elbatanouny , Mona Abdelraouf Ghallab

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Israa Mohammed Abdelmoneim Youssef , 2021Description: 117 P. : charts , facsimiles ; 25cmOther title:
  • المقارنة بين تأثير جهاز التحفيز التنفسى التدفقى و جهاز التحفيز التنفسى الكمى على غازات الدم الشريانية فى مرضى الالتهاب الرئوى [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Physical Therapy for Cardiopulmonary and Geriatrics Disorder Summary: Background: Pneumonia is still considered a serious medical disorder linked to significant rise in morbidity and mortality with cost load.The aim: The study purpose to compare the effect of flow and volume-oriented spirometry on patients with pneumonia. Methods: Forty male patients with pneumonia recruited from El-Kateb Hospital participated in the study.Their age ranged from 50 to 60 years.The patients were assigned randomly into two groups equal in number.The first group (A) included 20 patients who used flow-oriented spirometry with breathing control exercise with 3-4 times daily for one week. The second group (B) included 20 patients who used volume-oriented spirometry with 3-4 times breathing control exercise per day for one week. PaO2 and PaCO2 were examined by arterial blood sample analysis through the Laboratory GEM premier 3000 device.The oxygen saturation (SpO2) was measured using a pulse oximeter.All the measurement was done for every patient pre and post study in both groups.The results: Within groups (A and B), the results proved a significant increase in PaO2 (P=0.002 and 0.001 respectively), SpO2 (P=0.002 and 0.001 respectively) with no significant change in PaCO2 (P=0. 4 and 0.7 respectively). In between groups, PaO2 and SpO2 revealed significant differences (P=0.03 and 0.04 respectively) (p<0.05). However, the latter showed more improvement in both variables (27.1% and 6.6% respectively) compared to (14.2% and 3.1% respectively) in the former group
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Date due Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.21.02.M.Sc.2021.Is.E (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110085036000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.21.02.M.Sc.2021.Is.E (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 85036.CD Not for loan 01020110085036000

Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Physical Therapy for Cardiopulmonary and Geriatrics Disorder

Background: Pneumonia is still considered a serious medical disorder linked to significant rise in morbidity and mortality with cost load.The aim: The study purpose to compare the effect of flow and volume-oriented spirometry on patients with pneumonia. Methods: Forty male patients with pneumonia recruited from El-Kateb Hospital participated in the study.Their age ranged from 50 to 60 years.The patients were assigned randomly into two groups equal in number.The first group (A) included 20 patients who used flow-oriented spirometry with breathing control exercise with 3-4 times daily for one week. The second group (B) included 20 patients who used volume-oriented spirometry with 3-4 times breathing control exercise per day for one week. PaO2 and PaCO2 were examined by arterial blood sample analysis through the Laboratory GEM premier 3000 device.The oxygen saturation (SpO2) was measured using a pulse oximeter.All the measurement was done for every patient pre and post study in both groups.The results: Within groups (A and B), the results proved a significant increase in PaO2 (P=0.002 and 0.001 respectively), SpO2 (P=0.002 and 0.001 respectively) with no significant change in PaCO2 (P=0. 4 and 0.7 respectively). In between groups, PaO2 and SpO2 revealed significant differences (P=0.03 and 0.04 respectively) (p<0.05). However, the latter showed more improvement in both variables (27.1% and 6.6% respectively) compared to (14.2% and 3.1% respectively) in the former group

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.