Mulligan sustained natural apophyseal glides versus thoracic manipulation on mechanical neck pain : A randomized controlled study / Heba Allah Samy Said Ahmed ; Supervised Maher Ahmed Elkeblawy , Nabil Mahmoud Ismail
Material type:
- تحريك موليجان النتوئى المفصلى الطبيعى المستمر مقابل التحريك الصدرى على ألم الرقبة الميكانيكى : دراسة عشوائية محكمة [Added title page title]
- Issued also as CD
Item type | Current library | Home library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول | المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة | Cai01.21.09.Ph.D.2021.He.M (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Not for loan | 01010110085093000 | ||
![]() |
مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم | المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة | Cai01.21.09.Ph.D.2021.He.M (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 85093.CD | Not for loan | 01020110085093000 |
Browsing المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة shelves Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Basic Science
Objective: To investigate the adding effects of Mulligan sustained natural apophyseal glides (SNAGs) versus thoracic manipulation (TM) to conventional physical therapy (CPT) on pain, neck range of motion (ROM) and functional activities in subjects with mechanical neck pain (MNP). Design: Pretest- posttest Randomized controlled study. Setting: Department of physical therapy, Ain Shams university hospital.Participants: Sixty patients with MNP were assigned randomly into 3 equal groups with no significant differences among groups regarding age, weight, height, body mass index (BMI) and gender. Intervention: Mulligan SNAGs and CPT (group I), TM plus CPT (group II), and CPT only (group III). All participants received 3 sessions per week for four weeks. Outcome Measures: Pain intensity, pressure pain threshold (PPT), Neck ROM, and disability were measured at baseline, after 4 weeks and then after1 month with no intervention. Results: After 4 weeks of intervention, group I showed superiority to group II and III in all measured outcomes (P<0.05) except for flexion and extension ROM (P>0.05). Group II showed superiority to group III in all measured outcomes (P<0.05) except for flexion ROM and neck disability index (NDI) (P>0.05). After one-month follow-up, group I showed superiority to group II and III in all measured outcomes (P<0.05) except for extension ROM (P>0.05).Group II showed superiority to group III in all measured outcomes (P<0.05)
Issued also as CD
There are no comments on this title.