header
Image from OpenLibrary

Clinical efficacy of laterally closed tunnel with subepithelial connective tissue graft versus tunneling technique with subepithelial connective tissue graft in isolated recession type 2 : Randomized clinical trial / Yahya Hassan Elbanna Amer ; Supervised Manal Hosny , Hani Elnahass

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Yahya Hassan Elbanna Amer , 2021Description: 147 P . : charts , facsmilies ; 25cmOther title:
  • تجربة سريرية عشوائية : الفاعليه السريريه لجراحة النفق جانبى الاغلاق في مقابل الجراحة بتقنيه النفق المغلق بإستخدام التطعيم بالنسيج الضام تحت الطبقة الطلائية فى حالات انحسار اللثة الوضعية الفئه {u٠٦ئ٢} [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Periodontology Summary: Aim: This study aimed to identify the effectiveness of laterally closed tunnel technique versus modified coronally advanced tunneling technique in the treatment of RT 2 gingival recession. Methodology: The current randomized controlled clinical trial included in 26 patients, patients were randomly divided into two groups: Either the control group - Modified Coronally Advanced Tunneling (MCAT) with connective tissue graft (SCTG), or test group - Laterally Closed Tunnel (LCT) with SCTG. Clinical parameters (recession depth reduction, recession depth, recession width, probing depth, clinical attachment level, keratinized tissue width, gingival phenotype, and percentage of root coverage) were assessed at baseline, 3 and 6 months. Pain scores were also evaluated for the first 7 days postoperatively, while root coverage esthetic score and patient satisfaction were evaluated after 6 months. Results: In the LCT group all outcomes showed statistical significance between baseline with 3 and 6 months respectively except for probing depth and percentage of root coverage that showed no statistical significance. Likewise, in the modified coronally advanced tunnel group all outcomes appear to be statistically significant at baseline with 3 and 6 months except for probing depth and root coverage percentage. When comparing between LCT and MCAT techniques, all outcomes showed non-statistically significant at all time points
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Date due Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.08.Ph.D.2021.Ya.C (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110085300000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.08.Ph.D.2021.Ya.C (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 85300.CD Not for loan 01020110085300000

Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Periodontology

Aim: This study aimed to identify the effectiveness of laterally closed tunnel technique versus modified coronally advanced tunneling technique in the treatment of RT 2 gingival recession. Methodology: The current randomized controlled clinical trial included in 26 patients, patients were randomly divided into two groups: Either the control group - Modified Coronally Advanced Tunneling (MCAT) with connective tissue graft (SCTG), or test group - Laterally Closed Tunnel (LCT) with SCTG. Clinical parameters (recession depth reduction, recession depth, recession width, probing depth, clinical attachment level, keratinized tissue width, gingival phenotype, and percentage of root coverage) were assessed at baseline, 3 and 6 months. Pain scores were also evaluated for the first 7 days postoperatively, while root coverage esthetic score and patient satisfaction were evaluated after 6 months. Results: In the LCT group all outcomes showed statistical significance between baseline with 3 and 6 months respectively except for probing depth and percentage of root coverage that showed no statistical significance. Likewise, in the modified coronally advanced tunnel group all outcomes appear to be statistically significant at baseline with 3 and 6 months except for probing depth and root coverage percentage. When comparing between LCT and MCAT techniques, all outcomes showed non-statistically significant at all time points

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.