TY  - BOOK
AU  - Maysaa Mahmoud Mostafa Saad,
AU  - Maha Abdelsalam ElBaz 
AU  - Dina EzzEldin Mohamed 
TI  - Clinical performance of newly introduced self-cured universal adhesive versus light-cured universal adhesive for restoring cervical lesions in geriatric patients over one year: a randomized clinical tria 
U1  - 617.6 
PY  - 2024///
KW  - Dentistry
KW  - qrmak
KW  - Self-Cured Universal Adhesive
KW  - Light-Cured Universal Adhesive
KW  - 3M ESPE™
N1  - Thesis (M.Sc)-Cairo University, 2024; Bibliography: pages 71-86; Issues also as CD
N2  - Aim: This randomized clinical trial aimed to investigate the clinical performance of 
PALFIQUE universal adhesive (Tokuyama self-cure universal adhesive), Versus 3M ESPE™ 
Single bond Universal Adhesive, for restoring class V cavities in geriatric patients over one year. 
Methodology: A total of 28 geriatric participants randomly received 28 cervical carious 
restorations using either; PALFIQUE universal adhesive (Tokuyama self-cure universal adhesive) 
the intervention or 3M ESPE™ Single bond Universal Adhesive as the comparator. After cavity 
preparation, all cavities were etched using etch-and-rinse technique, then the universal adhesives 
the resin composite were utilized according to the manufacturer instructions. Restorations were 
evaluated using modified USPHS criteria by two blinded assessors at baseline, 3, 6. 9 and 12 
months. They were analysed using Mann-Whitney U test for intergroup comparisons while 
intragroup comparisons were done using Friedman‘s test followed by Nemenyi post hoc test. The 
significance level was set at p ≤0.05 within all tests. 
Results: After 12 months there was no statistically significant difference between both 
materials regarding marginal adaptation, retention, marginal discoloration, post-operative 
hypersensitivity and secondary caries (P= 0.769, P=1, P = 0.796, P = 1, P = 1) respectively. 
 Conclusion: The use of PALFIQUE universal adhesive (Tokuyama self-cure universal 
adhesive) is approved to show a similar clinical performance compared to 3M ESPE™ Single bond 
light-cure Universal Adhesive; Aim: This randomized clinical trial aimed to investigate the clinical performance of PALFIQUE universal adhesive (Tokuyama self-cure universal adhesive), Versus 3M ESPE™ Single bond Universal Adhesive, for restoring class V cavities in geriatric patients over one year. 
Methodology: A total of 28 geriatric participants randomly received 28 cervical carious restorations using either; PALFIQUE universal adhesive (Tokuyama self-cure universal adhesive) as the intervention or 3M ESPE™ Single bond Universal Adhesive as the comparator. After cavity preparation, all cavities were etched using etch-and-rinse technique, then the universal adhesives and the resin composite were utilized according to the manufacturer instructions. Restorations were evaluated using modified USPHS criteria by two blinded assessors at baseline, 3, 6. 9 and 12 months. They were analysed using Mann-Whitney U test for intergroup comparisons while intragroup comparisons were done using Friedman’s test followed by Nemenyi post hoc test. The significance level was set at p ≤0.05 within all tests. 
Results: After 12 months there was no statistically significant difference between both materials regarding marginal adaptation, retention, marginal discoloration, post-operative hypersensitivity and secondary caries (P= 0.769, P=1, P = 0.796, P = 1, P = 1) respectively.
 Conclusion: The use of PALFIQUE universal adhesive (Tokuyama self-cure universal adhesive) is approved to show a similar clinical performance compared to 3M ESPE™ Single bond light-cure Universal Adhesive
ER  -