TY  - BOOK
AU  - Halla Gamal Mohammed Esmail 
AU  - Azza Ezz Elarab , 
AU  - Weam Elbattawy , 
TI  - Management of miller class I & II gingival recession using conventional versus abrasive deepithelialization of palatal graft : : A randomized controlled clinical trial / 
PY  - 2021///
CY  - Cairo : 
PB  - Halla Gamal Mohammed Esmail , 
KW  - II Gingival recession
KW  - Miller class I
KW  - Palatal graft
N1  - Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Periodontology; Issued also as CD
N2  - Aim: The aim of the present clinical study is to compare post-operative morbidity and root coverage outcomes in patients subjected to conventional de-epithelialized free gingival graft (DFGG) and abrasive DFGG for the treatment of gingival recession.Methodology: Twenty sites in 13 patients showing Miller I / II gingival recession were selected and divided into intervention group where coronally advanced flap (CAF) combined with abrasive DFGG were performed while in the control group, CAF combined with conventional DFGG were performed. All the selected patients were assessed for postoperative morbidity and root coverage outcomes.Results: No statistically significant differences were demonstrated between the two groups in patients{u2019}post-operative pain and analgesics consumption. Root coverage results did not show a statistically  significant difference between the two groups except for gingival phenotype and recession width after 6  months were in favor of conventional DFGG. It was found that the conventional DFGG group was 2.25  folds prone to CRC than the abrasive DFGG group
ER  -