Prosthesis and implant survival in immediately loaded full arch restorations using fiber-reinforced versus non-reinforced temporary frameworks : A randomized clinical trial /
تجربة سريرية عشوائية : تقييم قدرة التركيبة والغرسات الداعمة لها على البقاء سليمة فى حالات الاستعاضة الكلية المباشرة للفك باستخدام تركيبات مؤقتة مدعمة بالألياف فى مقابل التركيبات الغير مدعمة بأى مقويات إضافية
Nermeen Ahmed Hassan Ahmed ; Supervised Amal Kaddah , Amr Hosni Elkhadem , Nada Sherin Ahmed
- Cairo : Nermeen Ahmed Hassan Ahmed , 2021
- 132 P . : charts , facsmilies ; 25cm
Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Prosthodontics
Aim: This study was done to evaluate and compare the prosthesis and implant survival in case of temporary fixed complete dentures with fiber reinforced frameworks versus those with non-reinforced frameworks in case of immediately loaded full arch restorations in completely edentulous patients. The associated marginal bone loss in both groups was also reported as well. Methodology: Completely edentulous patients were randomly allocated into two parallel arm groups. Non-reinforced control group (NR) in which patients received non-reinforced all-on-4 immediately loaded fixed restoration and Fiber reinforced group (FR) in which patients received all-on-4 fixed restoration with fiber reinforced framework. Prosthesis and implant survival was clinically evaluated after 4 month follow up period. In addition, digital peri-apical radiographs were taken for the implants using the paralleling technique to evaluate the amount of marginal bone loss in both groups Results: Prosthesis and implant survival was significantly higher in the FR group compared to the NR group. Also, there was a statistically significant decrease in the amount of marginal bone loss associated with the FR group (0.262 ± 0.1 mm) compared to the NR group (0.675 ± 0.22 mm)
Fiber reinforced frameworks Non-reinforced temporary frameworks Prosthesis and implant survival