header
Image from OpenLibrary

Added value of Elastography for Evaluation of breast masses detected on screening ultrasound / Doaa Ahmed Eltayeb Mohamed ; Supervised Soha Talaat Hamed , Marwa Anas Abdelrahman , Ahmed Mohamed Farahat

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Doaa Ahmed Eltayeb Mohamed , 2018Description: 121 P. : charts , facsimiles ; 25cmOther title:
  • القيمة المضافة لقياس المرونة بالموجات فوق الصوتية في تقييم أورام الثدي المكتشفة أثناء الكشف المبكر لأورام الثدي [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Radio-diagnosis Summary: Background: the major limitation of screening Breast US is substantial increase in the number of false-positive findings. Objective: was to evaluate the additional value of Elastography and to determine an appropriate guideline for the combined assessment of screening US detected breast masses. Patient & methods: an observational cross-sectional study that included 35 patients (with 39 breast lesions). Ultrasound Elastography (qualitative and quantitative) was performed following screening breast ultrasound. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and predictive values for both modalities were calculated. Results: US elastography was more sensitive and specific in differentiating benign from malignant lesions and decreasing numbers of unnecessary biopsies. The calculated sensitivity of combined ultrasound and elastography was 100%, specifity 94.4%, PPV 94.4% , NPV100% and the total accuracy 92.7% compared to 100%, 90.5%, 90%, 100% and 94.9% for US alone respectively. Qualitative elastography is more accurate which increase the specifity from 90.5% to 100%. Conclusion: US Elastography provides useful information about distinguishing benign and malignant lesions. Thus, consideration of lesion stiffness could increase positive predictive values and reduce unnecessary benign biopsies. The elastography is better to be done qualitative and quantitative as the qualitative is more specific than the quantitative
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Date due Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.11.31.M.Sc.2018.Do.A (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110076291000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.11.31.M.Sc.2018.Do.A (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 76291.CD Not for loan 01020110076291000

Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Radio-diagnosis

Background: the major limitation of screening Breast US is substantial increase in the number of false-positive findings. Objective: was to evaluate the additional value of Elastography and to determine an appropriate guideline for the combined assessment of screening US detected breast masses. Patient & methods: an observational cross-sectional study that included 35 patients (with 39 breast lesions). Ultrasound Elastography (qualitative and quantitative) was performed following screening breast ultrasound. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and predictive values for both modalities were calculated. Results: US elastography was more sensitive and specific in differentiating benign from malignant lesions and decreasing numbers of unnecessary biopsies. The calculated sensitivity of combined ultrasound and elastography was 100%, specifity 94.4%, PPV 94.4% , NPV100% and the total accuracy 92.7% compared to 100%, 90.5%, 90%, 100% and 94.9% for US alone respectively. Qualitative elastography is more accurate which increase the specifity from 90.5% to 100%. Conclusion: US Elastography provides useful information about distinguishing benign and malignant lesions. Thus, consideration of lesion stiffness could increase positive predictive values and reduce unnecessary benign biopsies. The elastography is better to be done qualitative and quantitative as the qualitative is more specific than the quantitative

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.