header
Image from OpenLibrary

Anesthetic efficacy of 2% mepivacaine versus 4% articaine for inferior alveolar nerve blocks in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in mandibular molars : A randomized clinical trial / Maged Mahmoud Amin Elabd ; Supervised Abeer Marzouk , Marwa Mahmoud Bedier

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Maged Mahmoud Amin Elabd , 2016Description: 135 P. : charts ; 25cmOther title:
  • فعالية تخدير 2{u066A} ميبيفاكايين مقابل 4{u066A}أرتيكايين في إحصار العصب السنخي السفلي في المرضى ذوى التهاب اللب غير الردود في أضراس الفك السفلى: تجربة إكلينيكية بالانتقاء العشوائي [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Endodontics Summary: Aim: This study was conducted to compare between 2% mepivacaine and 4% articaine for inferior alveolar nerve blocks in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in mandibular molars as regards to their anesthetic efficiency, during access cavity preparation and instrumentation utilizing a numerical rating scale (NRS).Methods: Sixty-six patients with irreversible pulpitis admitted to the department of endodontics, faculty of oral and dental medicine, Cairo University, Egypt, randomly received a conventional inferior alveolar nerve block containing either 3.6 ml of 2% mepivacaine hydrochloride with 1:100,000 epinephrine or 3.4 ml of 4% articaine hydrochloride with 1:100,000 epinephrine. During access cavity preparation and instrumentation, the patients were instructed to report any painful sensation and mark his/ her level of pain on the numerical rating scale (NRS). Results: Each group showed statistically significant difference in the incidence of pain degrees (no pains, mild pain, moderate pain, sever pain) at different levels (Pre-operative, during access cavity and during instrumentation). The success rate for the IAN block using the mepivacaine solution was 39% (13of 33) and for the articaine solution success was 45% (15of 33), There was no statistical significant difference between the two solutions. conclusions n either 2% mepivacaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine nor 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine, administered in a conventional IAN block, were entirely efficient in controlling pain during the treatment of symptomatic irreversible pulpitis.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Date due Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.02.M.Sc.2016.Ma.A (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110070380000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.02.M.Sc.2016.Ma.A (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 70380.CD Not for loan 01020110070380000

Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Endodontics

Aim: This study was conducted to compare between 2% mepivacaine and 4% articaine for inferior alveolar nerve blocks in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in mandibular molars as regards to their anesthetic efficiency, during access cavity preparation and instrumentation utilizing a numerical rating scale (NRS).Methods: Sixty-six patients with irreversible pulpitis admitted to the department of endodontics, faculty of oral and dental medicine, Cairo University, Egypt, randomly received a conventional inferior alveolar nerve block containing either 3.6 ml of 2% mepivacaine hydrochloride with 1:100,000 epinephrine or 3.4 ml of 4% articaine hydrochloride with 1:100,000 epinephrine. During access cavity preparation and instrumentation, the patients were instructed to report any painful sensation and mark his/ her level of pain on the numerical rating scale (NRS). Results: Each group showed statistically significant difference in the incidence of pain degrees (no pains, mild pain, moderate pain, sever pain) at different levels (Pre-operative, during access cavity and during instrumentation). The success rate for the IAN block using the mepivacaine solution was 39% (13of 33) and for the articaine solution success was 45% (15of 33), There was no statistical significant difference between the two solutions. conclusions n either 2% mepivacaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine nor 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine, administered in a conventional IAN block, were entirely efficient in controlling pain during the treatment of symptomatic irreversible pulpitis.

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.