header
Image from OpenLibrary

Comparative study between interlocking nail and locked plate in distal tibia fractures fixation / Abdulrhman Adel Moawad Hassan ; Supervised Amr Wael Farag , Ahmed Samy Elmaghraby

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Abdulrhman Adel Moawad Hassan , 2018Description: 124 P. : charts , facsimiles ; 25cmOther title:
  • دراسة مقارنة بين تثبيت كسور أسفل عظمة الساق بواسطة الشرائح ذاتية الغلق و المسمار النخاعى التشابكى [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Orthopedic Surgery Summary: Background: Distal tibia shaft fractures accounts for approximately 37.8% of all tibial injuries. Fractures of the distal tibia affecting all ages. Treatment of distal tibial fractures in skeletally mature patients without articular extension is challenging because of its unique anatomical characteristics of subcutaneous location with week blood supply and proximity to the ankle joint. Aim: To compare Interlocking nail (ILN) versus Distal tibial locked plate with minimally invasive technique (MIPPO) for fixation of this fracture. Materials and methods: A prospective randomized study was conducted involving 30 patients divided into two groups. Patients were assessed clinically using American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) and radiologically at 6 months. Results: The mean age for the MIPPO group was 35 ± 15.83 years, while the mean age for the ILN group was 34.33 ± 15.07 years. The mean follow up period was 7.13 months with a minimum of 6 months for all patients included. No statistical significance was found when the two groups were compared except in time for union.Mean time for union in ILN 14 ± 2.85 weeks, while in MIPPO group 17,07 ± 4.01 weeks. This showing statically significant for ILN. Conclusion: Both techniques can provide effective treatment and fixation for closed or G1 distal tibial extraarticular fractures. ILN showing lower infection rate and faster time to healing but with more mal-alignment reduction. While in MIPPO technique less mal-alignment reduction can achieved but with more infection problems and slower rate of union
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Date due Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.11.25.M.Sc.2018.Ab.C (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110077819000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.11.25.M.Sc.2018.Ab.C (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 77819.CD Not for loan 01020110077819000

Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Orthopedic Surgery

Background: Distal tibia shaft fractures accounts for approximately 37.8% of all tibial injuries. Fractures of the distal tibia affecting all ages. Treatment of distal tibial fractures in skeletally mature patients without articular extension is challenging because of its unique anatomical characteristics of subcutaneous location with week blood supply and proximity to the ankle joint. Aim: To compare Interlocking nail (ILN) versus Distal tibial locked plate with minimally invasive technique (MIPPO) for fixation of this fracture. Materials and methods: A prospective randomized study was conducted involving 30 patients divided into two groups. Patients were assessed clinically using American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) and radiologically at 6 months. Results: The mean age for the MIPPO group was 35 ± 15.83 years, while the mean age for the ILN group was 34.33 ± 15.07 years. The mean follow up period was 7.13 months with a minimum of 6 months for all patients included. No statistical significance was found when the two groups were compared except in time for union.Mean time for union in ILN 14 ± 2.85 weeks, while in MIPPO group 17,07 ± 4.01 weeks. This showing statically significant for ILN. Conclusion: Both techniques can provide effective treatment and fixation for closed or G1 distal tibial extraarticular fractures. ILN showing lower infection rate and faster time to healing but with more mal-alignment reduction. While in MIPPO technique less mal-alignment reduction can achieved but with more infection problems and slower rate of union

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.