header
Image from OpenLibrary

Enhancement of the human development index ranking using two-stage data envelopment analysis / Alyaa Hegazy Abdelhamid Ahmed ; Supervised Hussein Abdelaziz Sayed , Ramadan Hamed Mohamed , Samaa Hazem Hosny

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Alyaa Hegazy Abdelhamid Ahmed , 2017Description: 79 P. ; 25cmOther title:
  • تحسين رتب مؤشر التنمية البشرية باستخدام أسلوب التحليل التغليفي للبيانات على المرحلتين [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Economics and Political - Department of Statistics Summary: This thesis builds on the extensive literature of the rank reversal issue in Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) techniques. It is a continuation of the study of Sayed et al. (2015) that exhibited this problem in the Human Development Index (HDI) framework. The proposed methodology, the Goal Programming Benefit-of-the-Doubt (GP-BOD), aims to overcome this problem and obtain consistent and stable rankings. For investigating the credibility of the proposed methodology in solving this issue, it has been applied to the HDI dataset in 2012. The resulted HDI rankings are compared with those evaluated from eleven overlapping sub-groups that are internationally categorized based on geographic regions and income levels. The results show a solution to the ranking contradictions problem. Among other merits, the results prove two additional features of the proposed GP-BOD model. First, the resulted countries' rankings are distinguishable and absolutely tie-free. This enhances the discriminating power of the proposed rank preservation model. Second, the GP-BOD weights are evaluated on a common base to compare all countries on the same scale. Moreover, a lower bound is endogenously imposed on these weights to avoid the problem of zero weights. Finally, the validity of the proposed GP-BOD technique has been thoroughly examined using sensitivity tests. The results show stability in rankings when different methods of normalization and weighting are applied
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Date due Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.03.01.M.Sc.2017.Al.E (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110073761000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.03.01.M.Sc.2017.Al.E (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 73761.CD Not for loan 01020110073761000

Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Economics and Political - Department of Statistics

This thesis builds on the extensive literature of the rank reversal issue in Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) techniques. It is a continuation of the study of Sayed et al. (2015) that exhibited this problem in the Human Development Index (HDI) framework. The proposed methodology, the Goal Programming Benefit-of-the-Doubt (GP-BOD), aims to overcome this problem and obtain consistent and stable rankings. For investigating the credibility of the proposed methodology in solving this issue, it has been applied to the HDI dataset in 2012. The resulted HDI rankings are compared with those evaluated from eleven overlapping sub-groups that are internationally categorized based on geographic regions and income levels. The results show a solution to the ranking contradictions problem. Among other merits, the results prove two additional features of the proposed GP-BOD model. First, the resulted countries' rankings are distinguishable and absolutely tie-free. This enhances the discriminating power of the proposed rank preservation model. Second, the GP-BOD weights are evaluated on a common base to compare all countries on the same scale. Moreover, a lower bound is endogenously imposed on these weights to avoid the problem of zero weights. Finally, the validity of the proposed GP-BOD technique has been thoroughly examined using sensitivity tests. The results show stability in rankings when different methods of normalization and weighting are applied

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.