Efficacy of muscle energy technique versus instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization on postnatal low back pain / Marwa Abdelhaleem Aziz Mahmoud ; Supervised Hala Mohamed Hanfy Omara , Hossameldin Hussain Kamel , Mohamed Ahmed Mohamed Awad

By:

Marwa Abdelhaleem Aziz Mahmoud

Contributor(s):

Material type: Text

TextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Marwa Abdelhaleem Aziz Mahmoud , 2020Description: 98 P. : charts ; 25cmOther title:

فعالية تقنية طاقة العضلات مقابل أداة تحريك الأنسجة الرخوة على آلام أسفل الظهر بعد الولادة [Added title page title]

Subject(s):

Available additional physical forms:

Issued also as CD

Dissertation note: Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Physical Therapy for Gynecology and Obstetrics Summary: This study was conducted to compare the effect of muscle energy technique versus instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization on postnatal low back pain. Forty postnatal women participated in this study. They complained from low back pain (referred by physician). They were selected from Said Galal University Hospital in Cairo, Al Azhar University.Their ages ranged from 25 to 35 years old.Their body mass index was not exceeding 30 kg/m2. They did not receive any analgesics medical treatment during the research period. All of them were delivered vaginaly delivery by six weeks. Patients with radiculopathy, previous low back surgery, spondylolis thesis and chronic low back pain were excluded from the study. They were divided randomly into two equal groups (A&B). Group A treated by Instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization two times/ week for six weeks. Group B treated by Muscle energy technique two times /week for six weeks. Visual analogue scale was used to measure pain intensity and Modified schober's test was used to assess lumbar range of motion for both groups A and B before and after treatment. Results of this study found that, within groups There was a statistically highly significant decrease (P<0.001) in visual analog scale and a statistically highly significant increase (P<0.001) in lumbar spine range of motion in both groups A and B post treatment. Between groups the obtained results showed that there was no statistical significant difference pre treatment, but post treatment there was a statistically highly significant difference in low back pain intensity (more decrease in group A) and lumbar spine range of motion (more increase in group A)

Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.

Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Home library	Call number	Copy number	Status	Date due	Barcode
Thesis	قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول	المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة	Cai01.21.04.Ph.D.2020.Ma.E (Browse shelf(Opens below))		Not for loan		01010110081791000
CD - Rom	مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم	المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة	Cai01.21.04.Ph.D.2020.Ma.E (Browse shelf(Opens below))	81791.CD	Not for loan		01020110081791000

Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Physical Therapy for Gynecology and Obstetrics

This study was conducted to compare the effect of muscle energy technique versus instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization on postnatal low back pain. Forty postnatal women participated in this study. They complained from low back pain (referred by physician). They were selected from Said Galal University Hospital in Cairo, Al Azhar University.Their ages ranged from 25 to 35 years old.Their body mass index was not exceeding 30 kg/m2. They did not receive any analgesics medical treatment during the research period. All of them were delivered vaginaly delivery by six weeks. Patients with radiculopathy, previous low back surgery, spondylolis thesis and chronic low back pain were excluded from the study. They were divided randomly into two equal groups (A&B). Group A treated by Instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization two times/ week for six weeks. Group B treated by Muscle energy technique two times /week for six weeks. Visual analogue scale was used to measure pain intensity and Modified schober's test was used to assess lumbar range of motion for both groups A and B before and after treatment. Results of this study found that, within groups There was a statistically highly significant decrease (P<0.001) in visual analog scale and a statistically highly significant increase (P<0.001) in lumbar spine range of motion in both groups A and B post treatment. Between groups the obtained results showed that there was no statistical significant difference pre treatment, but post treatment there was a statistically highly significant difference in low back pain intensity (more decrease in group A) and lumbar spine range of motion (more increase in group A)

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.