header
Image from OpenLibrary

Evaluation of two modalities for deep bite correction by maxillary incisor intrusion / Manal Mohamed Elnamarawy ; Supervised Mohamed Abdelalim Bushnak , Fouad Elsharaby

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Manal Mohamed Elnamarawy , 2014Description: 115Leaves : charts , facsimiles ; 30cmOther title:
  • تقييم طريقتى علاج العضة الامامية العميقة [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Orthodontics Summary: Correction of deep bite problem through intrusion of maxillary incisors is done by several accepted treatment modalities. The comparative clinical performance of Burstone intrusive arch and miniscrew-supported intrusion has not previously been reported. Hence, the objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of these two treatment modalities for maxillary incisor intrusion. Results: The mean amount of overbite correction was 2.6 ± 0.8 (0.49 mm per month) in the miniscrew supported intrusion group and 2.9 ± 0.8 (0.60 mm per month) in Burstone intrusive arch group. No statistically significant difference was found in the extent of maxillary incisor intrusion between the two systems. The two intrusion systems were statistically different in the extent of incisor proclination, as Burstone intrusive arch group tended to procline upper incisors more than miniscrews-supported intrusion group. Conclusion: Both systems successfully intruded the 4 maxillary incisors almost with no loss to the sagittal and vertical anchorage. Although intrusive arch tended to procline upper incisors significantly.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Date due Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.06.M.Sc.2014.Ma.E (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110065969000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.06.M.Sc.2014.Ma.E (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 65969.CD Not for loan 01020110065969000

Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Orthodontics

Correction of deep bite problem through intrusion of maxillary incisors is done by several accepted treatment modalities. The comparative clinical performance of Burstone intrusive arch and miniscrew-supported intrusion has not previously been reported. Hence, the objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of these two treatment modalities for maxillary incisor intrusion. Results: The mean amount of overbite correction was 2.6 ± 0.8 (0.49 mm per month) in the miniscrew supported intrusion group and 2.9 ± 0.8 (0.60 mm per month) in Burstone intrusive arch group. No statistically significant difference was found in the extent of maxillary incisor intrusion between the two systems. The two intrusion systems were statistically different in the extent of incisor proclination, as Burstone intrusive arch group tended to procline upper incisors more than miniscrews-supported intrusion group. Conclusion: Both systems successfully intruded the 4 maxillary incisors almost with no loss to the sagittal and vertical anchorage. Although intrusive arch tended to procline upper incisors significantly.

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.