header
Image from OpenLibrary

Evaluation of postoperative pain after irrigation using end-vented navitip tips versus side-vented navitip tips in teeth with irreversible pulpitis : a randomized clinical trial - Part III- / Mohamed Ameen Basher Najm ; Supervised Angie Galal Ghoneim , Marwa Mahmoud Bedier

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Mohamed Ameen Basher Najm , 2017Description: 116 P. : charts , facsimiles ; 25cmOther title:
  • {uFE97}{uFED8}{uFBFF}{uFBFF}{uFEE2} أ{uئإؤئ}{uئإإ٢} {uئإإ٣}{uئإ٨إ} {uئإ٩١}{uئإأأ}{uئإءء} ا{uئإئ٩}رواء {uئإأآ}{uئإإ٨}{uئإءء} ا{uئإآ٣}{uئإ٩٨}{uئإء٨}{uئإءء}ام {uئإإ٧}{uئإ٨إ}{uئإؤ٣}{uئآئئ}{uئإ٩٨}{uئإ٩٠} {uئإإ٧}{uئآءؤ}{uئإ٨إ}{uئإ٨آ}{uئإئ٠} ا{uئإؤئ}{uئإؤ٤}{uئإ٩٨}{uئإء٤}{uئإ٨إ}ت {uئإإ٣}{uئإؤ٨}{uئإ٨إ}{uئإ٩١}{uئإؤإ} {uئإإ٧}{uئإ٨إ}{uئإؤ٣}{uئآئئ}{uئإ٩٨}{uئإ٩٠} {uئإ٩ئ}{uئإ٨إ}{uئإإ٧}{uئإ٩٢}{uئإئ٠} ا{uئإؤئ}{uئإؤ٤}{uئإ٩٨}{uئإء٤}{uئإ٨إ}ت{uئإإ٣}{uئإأء} {uئإء٣}{uئإ٨إ}{uئإئآ}ت ا{uئإئ٩}{uئإؤئ}{uئإ٩٨}{uئآءؤ}{uئإ٨إ}ب ا{uئإؤئ}{uئإإ٠}{uئإ٩٠} ا{uئإؤئ}{uئإؤ٠}{uئآئئ}{uئإءإ} ردود : درا{uئإآ٣}{uئإ٩٤} {uئإآ٣}{uئإءإ}{uئآئإ}{uئإءإ}{uئآئإ}{uئإ٩٤} {uئإأآ}{uئإآ٨}{uئإإإ}ا{uئإ٨آ}{uئآئئ}{uئإ٩٤} - ا{uئإؤئ}{uئإء٠}{uئإآ٠}ء ا{uئإؤئ}ثالث [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Endodontics Summary: This clinical study was conducted to compare the degree of post-operative pain and analgesic intake after the use of two different irrigation needles: NaviTip 29-gauge 27 mm End-Vented Tip and NaviTip 31-gauge 27 mm with Double Side port Irrigator Tip in patients with irreversible pulpitis in mandibular posterior teeth after single-visit root canal treatment using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at 0, 4, 12, 24, 48 and 72-hrs and 7 days The study design was a blinded randomized clinical trial as study participants and assessor didn{u2019}t know which intervention has been received. Thirty-eight patients with vital mandibular posterior teeth received single-visit root canal treatment using ProTaper Universal rotary system for canal preparation, they were randomly divided into two groups (n=19) according to the type of needle used for irrigation either NaviTip 29-gauge 27 mm End-Vented Tip or NaviTip 31-gauge 27 mm with Double Sideport Irrigator Tip. Pain was assessed using the NRS pre-operatively and at 0, 4, 12, 24, 48 and 72-hrs and 7 days post-operatively. All demographic data, clinical and NRS scores obtained from patients were analyzed and the results showed similarity between both groups regarding age and gender distribution, tooth type, canal number and pre-operative pain. Both needles showed drop in pain until it disappeared, the End-vented needles showed an observable increase in pain levels at 4, 12, 24, 48-hrs while the Side-vented needles showed an observable increase in pain at 12, 24, 48-hrs. The End vented NaviTip needles showed higher pain level than the Side vented NaviTip needles at 4, 12, 24-hrs, with no difference in drug intake post-operatively between both groups
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Date due Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.02.M.Sc.2017.Mo.E (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110075206000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.02.M.Sc.2017.Mo.E (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 75206.CD Not for loan 01020110075206000

Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Endodontics

This clinical study was conducted to compare the degree of post-operative pain and analgesic intake after the use of two different irrigation needles: NaviTip 29-gauge 27 mm End-Vented Tip and NaviTip 31-gauge 27 mm with Double Side port Irrigator Tip in patients with irreversible pulpitis in mandibular posterior teeth after single-visit root canal treatment using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at 0, 4, 12, 24, 48 and 72-hrs and 7 days The study design was a blinded randomized clinical trial as study participants and assessor didn{u2019}t know which intervention has been received. Thirty-eight patients with vital mandibular posterior teeth received single-visit root canal treatment using ProTaper Universal rotary system for canal preparation, they were randomly divided into two groups (n=19) according to the type of needle used for irrigation either NaviTip 29-gauge 27 mm End-Vented Tip or NaviTip 31-gauge 27 mm with Double Sideport Irrigator Tip. Pain was assessed using the NRS pre-operatively and at 0, 4, 12, 24, 48 and 72-hrs and 7 days post-operatively. All demographic data, clinical and NRS scores obtained from patients were analyzed and the results showed similarity between both groups regarding age and gender distribution, tooth type, canal number and pre-operative pain. Both needles showed drop in pain until it disappeared, the End-vented needles showed an observable increase in pain levels at 4, 12, 24, 48-hrs while the Side-vented needles showed an observable increase in pain at 12, 24, 48-hrs. The End vented NaviTip needles showed higher pain level than the Side vented NaviTip needles at 4, 12, 24-hrs, with no difference in drug intake post-operatively between both groups

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.