header
Local cover image
Local cover image
Image from OpenLibrary

Spinal manipulation versus mulligan mobilization in low back dysfunction / Mohammed Nabil Ibrahim Fiaad ; Supervised Wadida H. Elsayed , Aly M. Elzawahry , Mary Kamal Nassif Takla

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Mohammed Nabil Ibrahim Fiaad , 2019Description: 104 P. : charts , photoghraphs ; 25cmOther title:
  • تحريك الفقرات مقابل التحريك بتقنية موليجان فى الخلل الوظيفى المزمن لأسفل الظهر [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Online resources: Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Basic Sciences Summary: Background: Low back dysfunction (LBD) is the most common complaint of the working age population, in addition to human suffering; it causes an economic burden due to the use of medical services and absence from work. The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of Spinal Manipulation with Mulligan lumbar mobilization on pain intensity level, functional impairment, and spinal mobility in patients with chronic LBD. Subjects: Forty five patients (24 male and 21 female) were diagnosed with chronic LBD, aged from 25 to 40 years. Method: Subjects were randomly divided into three groups (fifteen patients each); group A (control group) received conventional physical therapy program included Infrared and strength exercises for back and abdominal muscles. Group B received conventional physical therapy program and Spinal Manipulation technique. Group C received conventional physical therapy program and Mulligan lumbar mobilization technique. The treatment was applied three days/week for four weeks. Pain intensity level, Functional impairment and Lumbar flexion ROM was measured by Visual Analogue Scale, Oswestry disability scale and Inclinometer respectively. Measurements were taken at two intervals pre-treatment and post-treatment. Results: There were statistical differences among the three groups, where group B showed greater improvement in pain intensity level, functional impairment, and spinal mobility than other two groups
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.21.09.Ph.D.2019.Mo.S (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110079870000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.21.09.Ph.D.2019.Mo.S (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 79870.CD Not for loan 01020110079870000

Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Basic Sciences

Background: Low back dysfunction (LBD) is the most common complaint of the working age population, in addition to human suffering; it causes an economic burden due to the use of medical services and absence from work. The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of Spinal Manipulation with Mulligan lumbar mobilization on pain intensity level, functional impairment, and spinal mobility in patients with chronic LBD. Subjects: Forty five patients (24 male and 21 female) were diagnosed with chronic LBD, aged from 25 to 40 years. Method: Subjects were randomly divided into three groups (fifteen patients each); group A (control group) received conventional physical therapy program included Infrared and strength exercises for back and abdominal muscles. Group B received conventional physical therapy program and Spinal Manipulation technique. Group C received conventional physical therapy program and Mulligan lumbar mobilization technique. The treatment was applied three days/week for four weeks. Pain intensity level, Functional impairment and Lumbar flexion ROM was measured by Visual Analogue Scale, Oswestry disability scale and Inclinometer respectively. Measurements were taken at two intervals pre-treatment and post-treatment. Results: There were statistical differences among the three groups, where group B showed greater improvement in pain intensity level, functional impairment, and spinal mobility than other two groups

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Local cover image