header
Image from OpenLibrary

Interfrential electrical stimulation versus pulsed electromagnetic field in management of intermittent claudication / Mona Mahmoud Mohamed Abdelhady ; Supervised Nesreen Gharib Elnahas , Mohamed Hamza Hamed , Nagy Louis Nassif

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Mona Mahmoud Mohamed Abdelhady , 2020Description: 126 P. : charts , facsimiles ; 25cmOther title:
  • التحفيز الكهربائى التداخلى مقابل الموجات الكهرومغناطيسية المتقطعة فى علاج العرج المتقطع [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Physical Therapy for Cardiolmonary and Geriatrics and Disorders Summary: Aim: This study was conducted to compare between the therapeutic efficacyof Interfrential electrical stimulation versus pulsed electromagnetic field in management of intermittent claudication (IC).Subjects: Forty five patients of both sexes, participated in this study, were selected from out patients clinic of vascular department in Ahmed Maher Teaching Hospital. Their ages ranged from 50 to 60 years old. Methods: All patients were evaluated by Ankle Brachial pressure Index (ABPI), Graded Treadmill exercise testing to determine (ACD,PWT), Walking impairement questionnaire (WIQ). The patients were randomly assigned into three equal groups; group (A) 15 patients received 30 min of pulsed electromagnetic field for 8 weeks in addition to heel raise exercise and calf stretch exercise and their medical treatment, (B) 15 patients received 20 min of interfrential electrical stimulation for 8 weeks in addition to heel raise exercise and calf stretch exerciseand their medical treatment. (C) Control group: 15 patients received their medical treatment only. Results:results of this study showed that there were significant difference for all groups of the study in a favor of group (A) and the percentage of improvement was represented in values of each (55.94 % of ACD, 64.44 % of PWT, 3.9% of ABPI ,WIQ distance score 88.23%, 74.01 of speed score, 22.45 of symptoms impairement).Conclusion: On the basis of this study, it could be concluded that pulsed Electromagnetic field moreeffective than interfrential electrical stimulation in management of patients with intermittent claudicationand that is through improvingtheir walking efficiency and functional capacity
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Date due Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.21.02.M.Sc.2020.Mo.I (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110081772000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.21.02.M.Sc.2020.Mo.I (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 81772.CD Not for loan 01020110081772000

Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Physical Therapy for Cardiolmonary and Geriatrics and Disorders

Aim: This study was conducted to compare between the therapeutic efficacyof Interfrential electrical stimulation versus pulsed electromagnetic field in management of intermittent claudication (IC).Subjects: Forty five patients of both sexes, participated in this study, were selected from out patients clinic of vascular department in Ahmed Maher Teaching Hospital. Their ages ranged from 50 to 60 years old. Methods: All patients were evaluated by Ankle Brachial pressure Index (ABPI), Graded Treadmill exercise testing to determine (ACD,PWT), Walking impairement questionnaire (WIQ). The patients were randomly assigned into three equal groups; group (A) 15 patients received 30 min of pulsed electromagnetic field for 8 weeks in addition to heel raise exercise and calf stretch exercise and their medical treatment, (B) 15 patients received 20 min of interfrential electrical stimulation for 8 weeks in addition to heel raise exercise and calf stretch exerciseand their medical treatment. (C) Control group: 15 patients received their medical treatment only. Results:results of this study showed that there were significant difference for all groups of the study in a favor of group (A) and the percentage of improvement was represented in values of each (55.94 % of ACD, 64.44 % of PWT, 3.9% of ABPI ,WIQ distance score 88.23%, 74.01 of speed score, 22.45 of symptoms impairement).Conclusion: On the basis of this study, it could be concluded that pulsed Electromagnetic field moreeffective than interfrential electrical stimulation in management of patients with intermittent claudicationand that is through improvingtheir walking efficiency and functional capacity

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.