header
Image from OpenLibrary

Facial gingival level evaluation following soft tissue augmentation using connective tissue graft around immediate dental implants versus immediate dental implants alone in the esthetic zone : Randomized controlled clinical trial / Parryhan Mohamed Abdelsamie Mohamed ; Supervised Azza Mohamed Ezz Elarab , Riham Omar Ibrahim , Ahmed Reda Abdelrahman

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Parryhan Mohamed Abdelsamie Mohamed , 2020Description: 215 P. : charts , facsimiles ; 25cmOther title:
  • تقييم مستوى اللثه الوجهى بعد زياده الأنسجه الرخوة بإستخدام طعم النسيج الضام حول الغرسات السنية الفوريه مقابل الغرسات السنية الفوريه بمفردها بالمنطقه الجماليه : تجربة سريريه عشوائية منضبطه [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Periodontology Summary: Aim: The current study aimed to compare between immediate dental implants alone versus combined immediate dental implants with subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) in esthetic zone, and to assess whether augmentation of the soft tissues could be an innovative option for less facial soft tissue recession. Methodology: In this parallel-designed RCT, a total of 18 participants were treated with single immediate post-extraction implants with SCTG placed using tunnel technique in the labial area (intervention group) and immediate implants treated without raising a flap and without SCTG (control group). Patients were observed with clinical, esthetic, and patient reported parameters at baseline, 3, and 6 months' follow-up after implant placement. Data were analyzed using the ANOVA test to test the mean differences of the data that follow normal distribution and had repeated measures (between groups, within groups and overall difference). Results: After 6 months, facial gingival level changes were (3.72 mm ± 0.9) for the control group and (3.06 mm ± 0.9) for the intervention group, where the mean difference was 0.66 mm (95% CI, -0.53 to 1.85; P= 0.245). Regarding overall percentage change from baseline to 6 months; statistically significant differences were found between control group (25.17 ± 8.2) and intervention group (4.93 ± 0.2), mean difference was 20.63 (95% CI, 0.40 to 40.86; P= 0.054)
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Date due Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.08.Ph.D.2020.Pa.F (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110083210000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.08.Ph.D.2020.Pa.F (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 83210.CD Not for loan 01020110083210000

Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Periodontology

Aim: The current study aimed to compare between immediate dental implants alone versus combined immediate dental implants with subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) in esthetic zone, and to assess whether augmentation of the soft tissues could be an innovative option for less facial soft tissue recession. Methodology: In this parallel-designed RCT, a total of 18 participants were treated with single immediate post-extraction implants with SCTG placed using tunnel technique in the labial area (intervention group) and immediate implants treated without raising a flap and without SCTG (control group). Patients were observed with clinical, esthetic, and patient reported parameters at baseline, 3, and 6 months' follow-up after implant placement. Data were analyzed using the ANOVA test to test the mean differences of the data that follow normal distribution and had repeated measures (between groups, within groups and overall difference). Results: After 6 months, facial gingival level changes were (3.72 mm ± 0.9) for the control group and (3.06 mm ± 0.9) for the intervention group, where the mean difference was 0.66 mm (95% CI, -0.53 to 1.85; P= 0.245). Regarding overall percentage change from baseline to 6 months; statistically significant differences were found between control group (25.17 ± 8.2) and intervention group (4.93 ± 0.2), mean difference was 20.63 (95% CI, 0.40 to 40.86; P= 0.054)

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.