header
Image from OpenLibrary

Effect of ultrasonic lipocavitation on normal lipid profile in healthy subjects / Rania Mohammed Ahmed Elsayed ; Supervised Awatef Mohammed Labib , Amira Hussin Draz

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Rania Mohammed Ahmed Elsayed , 2019Description: 122 P. : charts , photoghraphs ; 25cmOther title:
  • تأثير الموجات فوق الصوتيه التجويفي علي مستوى دهون الدم في الاشخاص الأصحاء [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Basic Science Summary: Background: Obesity has become a major social and health problem, and is a risk factor for many diseases. Purpose: this study was conducted to investigate the effect of low frequency ultrasonic lipocavitation on normal lipid profile of healthy subjects with localized fat deposits in abdomen. Design: pretest posttest repeated measure study. Subjects: Forty eight volunteer healthy women participated in the study, their age was (25- 45) years old and their body mass index (BMI) was (25- 35) Kg/m2. Method: All participants adhered to balanced healthy diet to maintain body weight and received 12 sessions of ultrasonic lipocavitation on abdominal area along 6 weeks with session frequency of 2 sessions weekly and session duration of 25 min with ultrasonic Frequency of 32 -36 KHz, Output Power of 10-70 Watt/cm2. Lipid profile, BMI, waist circumference (WC), abdomen circumference (AC), waist/hip ratio (WHR), body fat mass (BFM) and trunk fat (TF) were measured before treatment, after 4 weeks of treatment and repeated again at the end of treatment after 6 weeks. Results: there was a significant decrease in values of total cholesterol, triglycerides, low density lipoproteins, WC, AC, WHR, BFM and TF mass. Also significant increase in high density lipoproteins favoring "post 4 weeks of treatment" and " post 6 weeks of treatment " in compare to pretreatment and favoring post 6 weeks in compare to post 4 weeks of treatment
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Date due Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.21.09.M.Sc.2019.Ra.E (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110078786000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.21.09.M.Sc.2019.Ra.E (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 78786.CD Not for loan 01020110078786000

Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Basic Science

Background: Obesity has become a major social and health problem, and is a risk factor for many diseases. Purpose: this study was conducted to investigate the effect of low frequency ultrasonic lipocavitation on normal lipid profile of healthy subjects with localized fat deposits in abdomen. Design: pretest posttest repeated measure study. Subjects: Forty eight volunteer healthy women participated in the study, their age was (25- 45) years old and their body mass index (BMI) was (25- 35) Kg/m2. Method: All participants adhered to balanced healthy diet to maintain body weight and received 12 sessions of ultrasonic lipocavitation on abdominal area along 6 weeks with session frequency of 2 sessions weekly and session duration of 25 min with ultrasonic Frequency of 32 -36 KHz, Output Power of 10-70 Watt/cm2. Lipid profile, BMI, waist circumference (WC), abdomen circumference (AC), waist/hip ratio (WHR), body fat mass (BFM) and trunk fat (TF) were measured before treatment, after 4 weeks of treatment and repeated again at the end of treatment after 6 weeks. Results: there was a significant decrease in values of total cholesterol, triglycerides, low density lipoproteins, WC, AC, WHR, BFM and TF mass. Also significant increase in high density lipoproteins favoring "post 4 weeks of treatment" and " post 6 weeks of treatment " in compare to pretreatment and favoring post 6 weeks in compare to post 4 weeks of treatment

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.