header
Image from OpenLibrary

Phonophoresis versus iontophoresis in supraspinatus tendinitis / Hayam Mahmoud Hamza Ahmed ; Supervised Haytham M. Elhafez , Hussien Abdalrahman Hussien , Rania Refaat

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Hayam Mahmoud Hamza Ahmed , 2015Description: 89 P. : charts , facsimiles ; 25cmOther title:
  • إدخال الأيونات عن طريق الموجات فوق الصوتية مقابل المداواه بالرحلان الايونى فى التهاب الوتر فوق الشوكى [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Basic Science Summary: Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of Phonophoresis versus Iontophoresis in relieving pain and increase range of motion in patients with supraspinatus tendinitis. Method: 30patients with supraspinatus tendinitis were divided in two groups (A) 15 patients received lidocaine hydrochloride 2%gel Phonophoresis with 1MHz and intensity 1.5W/cm2 for 5 min for 12 sessions and each session time was 35 min, (B) 15 patients received lidocaine hydrocloride 2% solution Iontophoresis with current intensity 0.5mA/min for 5 min. for 12 sessions and each session time was 35 min, Results: Statistical analysis revealed that there was a significant increase in shoulder range of moion (flexion, abduction, external rotation) measured by inclinometer between before and after treatment in group A. (17.77%,23.43%,27.27%) in group B (18.97%, 39.82%,52.83%)and significant decrease in the pain level measured by VAS between before and after treatment in the two experimental groups with percentages of (43.03%,89.87%). Conclusion: there is a significant improvement in ROM of both groups with increased percentage in iontophoresis application. Pain is deceased significantly in iontophoresis group than phonophoresis group
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Date due Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.21.09.M.Sc.2015.Ha.P (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110067355000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.21.09.M.Sc.2015.Ha.P (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 67355.CD Not for loan 01020110067355000

Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Basic Science

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of Phonophoresis versus Iontophoresis in relieving pain and increase range of motion in patients with supraspinatus tendinitis. Method: 30patients with supraspinatus tendinitis were divided in two groups (A) 15 patients received lidocaine hydrochloride 2%gel Phonophoresis with 1MHz and intensity 1.5W/cm2 for 5 min for 12 sessions and each session time was 35 min, (B) 15 patients received lidocaine hydrocloride 2% solution Iontophoresis with current intensity 0.5mA/min for 5 min. for 12 sessions and each session time was 35 min, Results: Statistical analysis revealed that there was a significant increase in shoulder range of moion (flexion, abduction, external rotation) measured by inclinometer between before and after treatment in group A. (17.77%,23.43%,27.27%) in group B (18.97%, 39.82%,52.83%)and significant decrease in the pain level measured by VAS between before and after treatment in the two experimental groups with percentages of (43.03%,89.87%). Conclusion: there is a significant improvement in ROM of both groups with increased percentage in iontophoresis application. Pain is deceased significantly in iontophoresis group than phonophoresis group

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.