header
Image from OpenLibrary

Randomized controlled study between baska mask versus Air-Q blocker as a conduit for ventilation in adult patients with expected difficult intubation / Mohammad Yousof Mohammad ; Supervsied Nadia Yousof Hamed Helmy , Sabah Abdelraaof Mohammad , Ahmed Farag Mohammad

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Mohammad Yousof Mohammad , 2017Description: 59 P. : charts , facsimiles ; 25cmOther title:
  • دراسه مقارنة عشوائية بين قناع الحنجرة باسكا و قناع الإيركيو المانع كوسيلة لتهوية الرئتين فى المرضى البالغين المتوقع معهم صعوبة فى ادخال الأنبوبة الحنجرية [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Anaesthesia Summary: Background: In this study, we compare between baska mask versus Air-Q blocker as a conduit for ventilation in adult patients with expected difficult intubation. Methods and material: Thirty four adult patients with expected difficult intubation who are scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia are randomly divided into 2 equal groups: Group A (n=17), in which disposable Air-Q blocker is used for ventilation. Group B (n=17), in which Baska mask is used for ventilation. We recorded: the success rate of each device insertion, the time of insertion of the device, The manipulations required for placement of each device, The oropharyngeal leak pressure, hemodynamic data just before device insertion and after device insertion and appearance of capnography waves to monitor the occurrence of any hemodynamic stress response. Also, we recorded the success rate for insertion of gastric tube through the integrated drainage channel present in both devices and the presence of complications as laryngospasm, breath holding , post-operative blood stains, sore throat or hoarseness of voice is assessed at 0, 2 and 4h. Results: In our study, we found that the Air-Q blocker needed short time for insertion (17.3±4.2 sec) than BASKA mask (19.4±7.1sec). This finding was not statistically significant. Our results regarding success rate of insertion, we found that the success rate of insertion using Air-Q blocker was (100%) which was higher than using baska mask at first trial 89% of insertion
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Date due Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.11.01.M.Sc.2017.Mo.R (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110074489000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.11.01.M.Sc.2017.Mo.R (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 74489.CD Not for loan 01020110074489000

Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Anaesthesia

Background: In this study, we compare between baska mask versus Air-Q blocker as a conduit for ventilation in adult patients with expected difficult intubation. Methods and material: Thirty four adult patients with expected difficult intubation who are scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia are randomly divided into 2 equal groups: Group A (n=17), in which disposable Air-Q blocker is used for ventilation. Group B (n=17), in which Baska mask is used for ventilation. We recorded: the success rate of each device insertion, the time of insertion of the device, The manipulations required for placement of each device, The oropharyngeal leak pressure, hemodynamic data just before device insertion and after device insertion and appearance of capnography waves to monitor the occurrence of any hemodynamic stress response. Also, we recorded the success rate for insertion of gastric tube through the integrated drainage channel present in both devices and the presence of complications as laryngospasm, breath holding , post-operative blood stains, sore throat or hoarseness of voice is assessed at 0, 2 and 4h. Results: In our study, we found that the Air-Q blocker needed short time for insertion (17.3±4.2 sec) than BASKA mask (19.4±7.1sec). This finding was not statistically significant. Our results regarding success rate of insertion, we found that the success rate of insertion using Air-Q blocker was (100%) which was higher than using baska mask at first trial 89% of insertion

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.