header
Local cover image
Local cover image
Image from OpenLibrary

Comparitive study among three physical therapy programs of shoulder impingment syndrome in body building athelets / Ahmed Rageh Saber Ali ; Supervised Nadia Abdelazeem Fayaz , Ebtessam Fawzy Gomaa , Ahmad Hamdi Azzam

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Ahmed Rageh Saber Ali , 2019Description: 79 P. : charts , facsimiles ; 25cmOther title:
  • دراسة مقارنة بين ثلاثة برامج علاج طبيعي في متلازمة انحشار الكتف عند رياضى كمال الأجسام [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Online resources: Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Musculoskeletal Disorders Summary: Background: Shoulder impingement syndrome (SIS) is the most common cause of shoulder pain. Weight training places shoulder in unfavorable positions such as end-range external rotation while under heavy loads, creating joint and muscle imbalances and predisposing the shoulder to injury. Porpuse: this study was to evaluate differences amoung three physical therapy programs in treatment of impingment syndrome in bodybuilding players. Subjectes and methods:45 patients (25-40 years old) with impengiment syndrome selected from athletes participating in practice body-building. Patients were randomly assigned into three groups (15 patients in each group).Outcoms: posterior capsule tightness (PCT), glenohumeral internal rotation deficit (GIRD), dyskinesis (type2) and rotator cuff strength were assessed using Hand held dynamometer, goniometer and tape measurement before and after 4 weeks of treatment. Result : There was a statistical significant difference between the three groups post one month of intervention in external rotator strenrngth (P=0.034), lower trapezius strength (P=0.005) and scapular load test (dayskinesis) (P=0.214). the diffrences was to the favor of group C .Although all groups had a significal improvemrnt post treatment in all other measured parameters ,but there was no statistical significal diffrenceses between the three groups (P>0.05)
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.21.03.M.Sc.2019.Ah.C (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110078507000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.21.03.M.Sc.2019.Ah.C (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 78507.CD Not for loan 01020110078507000

Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Musculoskeletal Disorders

Background: Shoulder impingement syndrome (SIS) is the most common cause of shoulder pain. Weight training places shoulder in unfavorable positions such as end-range external rotation while under heavy loads, creating joint and muscle imbalances and predisposing the shoulder to injury. Porpuse: this study was to evaluate differences amoung three physical therapy programs in treatment of impingment syndrome in bodybuilding players. Subjectes and methods:45 patients (25-40 years old) with impengiment syndrome selected from athletes participating in practice body-building. Patients were randomly assigned into three groups (15 patients in each group).Outcoms: posterior capsule tightness (PCT), glenohumeral internal rotation deficit (GIRD), dyskinesis (type2) and rotator cuff strength were assessed using Hand held dynamometer, goniometer and tape measurement before and after 4 weeks of treatment. Result : There was a statistical significant difference between the three groups post one month of intervention in external rotator strenrngth (P=0.034), lower trapezius strength (P=0.005) and scapular load test (dayskinesis) (P=0.214). the diffrences was to the favor of group C .Although all groups had a significal improvemrnt post treatment in all other measured parameters ,but there was no statistical significal diffrenceses between the three groups (P>0.05)

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Local cover image