header
Local cover image
Local cover image
Image from OpenLibrary

Comparative study using biomimetic remineralization versus fluoride varnish in management of white spot lesion in post orthodontic treated patient : Split mouth randomized clinical trial / Aalaa Mohamed Nabil Amin ; Supervised Mohamed Farid Riad , Rasha Raafat

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Aalaa Mohamed Nabil Amin , 2019Description: 96 P. : charts , facsimiles , photographs ; 25cmOther title:
  • دراسة مقارنة عن طريق المحاكاة البيولوجية فى إعادة التمعدن مقابل ورنيش الفلوريد فى معالجة آفة البقع البيضاء بعد تقويم الأسنان : تقنية تقسيم الفم الاكلينيكية العشوائية [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Online resources: Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Operative Dentistry Summary: The current study was conducted to compare the effect of color change between remineralizing agent and guided enamel regeneration in treatment of white spot lesion after orthodontic treatments. Materials & methods: in split mouth design, white spot lesions in anteriorteeth of post orthodontic debanding patients received randomly two types ofremineralizing agents, either Curodont Repair (self-assembling peptide p11-4) or Duraphat Fluoride varnish single dose, both materials were applied according tothe manufacturer{u2019}s instructions. White spot lesions were evaluated before andafter 3, 6 months follow up periods by two blinded assessors to assess patientsatisfaction using VAS score and color change by Vita Easyhshade. Results: Friedmann test was used to compare between follow-up periods forvisual analogue scale (VAS). A p-value less than or equal to 0.05 was consideredstatistically significant The patient satisfaction showed statistically significantdifference after application of Curodont Repair for 3 & 6 months follow up periods;in contrast with the results of Duraphat which record patient un satisfactionfor color change of white spot lesion. However repeated ANOVA was used toshow the effect of materials and follow-up periods. The color change of white spot lesions after application of both materials showed statistically significant difference with Curodont Repair for 6 months record results lower than that of Duraphat, this means better color change using Curodont Repair in treatment of white spot lesion
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.03.Ph.D.2019.Al.C (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110081163000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.03.Ph.D.2019.Al.C (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 81163.CD Not for loan 01020110081163000

Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Operative Dentistry

The current study was conducted to compare the effect of color change between remineralizing agent and guided enamel regeneration in treatment of white spot lesion after orthodontic treatments. Materials & methods: in split mouth design, white spot lesions in anteriorteeth of post orthodontic debanding patients received randomly two types ofremineralizing agents, either Curodont Repair (self-assembling peptide p11-4) or Duraphat Fluoride varnish single dose, both materials were applied according tothe manufacturer{u2019}s instructions. White spot lesions were evaluated before andafter 3, 6 months follow up periods by two blinded assessors to assess patientsatisfaction using VAS score and color change by Vita Easyhshade. Results: Friedmann test was used to compare between follow-up periods forvisual analogue scale (VAS). A p-value less than or equal to 0.05 was consideredstatistically significant The patient satisfaction showed statistically significantdifference after application of Curodont Repair for 3 & 6 months follow up periods;in contrast with the results of Duraphat which record patient un satisfactionfor color change of white spot lesion. However repeated ANOVA was used toshow the effect of materials and follow-up periods. The color change of white spot lesions after application of both materials showed statistically significant difference with Curodont Repair for 6 months record results lower than that of Duraphat, this means better color change using Curodont Repair in treatment of white spot lesion

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Local cover image