header
Image from OpenLibrary

Management of miller class I & II gingival recession using conventional versus abrasive deepithelialization of palatal graft : A randomized controlled clinical trial / Halla Gamal Mohammed Esmail ; Supervised Azza Ezz Elarab , Weam Elbattawy

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Halla Gamal Mohammed Esmail , 2021Description: 178 P. : charts , facsimiles ; 25cmOther title:
  • علاج الانحسار اللثوى ميلر الدرجة الأولى والثانية باستخدام نزع طلاء الطعم الحنكى التقليدى فى مقابل نزع طلاء الطعم الحنكى بالكشط : تجربة سريرية إكلينيكية عشوائية مضبوطة [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Periodontology Summary: Aim: The aim of the present clinical study is to compare post-operative morbidity and root coverage outcomes in patients subjected to conventional de-epithelialized free gingival graft (DFGG) and abrasive DFGG for the treatment of gingival recession.Methodology: Twenty sites in 13 patients showing Miller I / II gingival recession were selected and divided into intervention group where coronally advanced flap (CAF) combined with abrasive DFGG were performed while in the control group, CAF combined with conventional DFGG were performed. All the selected patients were assessed for postoperative morbidity and root coverage outcomes.Results: No statistically significant differences were demonstrated between the two groups in patients{u2019}post-operative pain and analgesics consumption. Root coverage results did not show a statistically significant difference between the two groups except for gingival phenotype and recession width after 6 months were in favor of conventional DFGG. It was found that the conventional DFGG group was 2.25 folds prone to CRC than the abrasive DFGG group
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Date due Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.08.M.Sc.2021.Ha.M (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110084274000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.08.M.Sc.2021.Ha.M (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 84274.CD Not for loan 01020110084274000

Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Periodontology

Aim: The aim of the present clinical study is to compare post-operative morbidity and root coverage outcomes in patients subjected to conventional de-epithelialized free gingival graft (DFGG) and abrasive DFGG for the treatment of gingival recession.Methodology: Twenty sites in 13 patients showing Miller I / II gingival recession were selected and divided into intervention group where coronally advanced flap (CAF) combined with abrasive DFGG were performed while in the control group, CAF combined with conventional DFGG were performed. All the selected patients were assessed for postoperative morbidity and root coverage outcomes.Results: No statistically significant differences were demonstrated between the two groups in patients{u2019}post-operative pain and analgesics consumption. Root coverage results did not show a statistically significant difference between the two groups except for gingival phenotype and recession width after 6 months were in favor of conventional DFGG. It was found that the conventional DFGG group was 2.25 folds prone to CRC than the abrasive DFGG group

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.