header
Local cover image
Local cover image
Image from OpenLibrary

Trunk restraining versus balance training on reaching and hand function in stroke patients / Nagwa Ibrahim Mohammed Rehab ; Supervised Hussein Ahmed Shaker , Salah Sawan , Ebtesam Mohammed Fahmy

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Nagwa Ibrahim Mohammed Rehab , 2014Description: 181 P. : charts , facsimiles ; 25cmOther title:
  • تقييد الجذع مقابل تدريب االتزان على وصول ووظيفة اليد فى مرضى السكتة الدماغية [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Online resources: Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Physical Therapy for Neuromuscular and Neurosurgery Summary: Back ground and Purpose: The ability to reach and grasp is a necessary component of many daily life functional tasks, hence reduced upper limb function has an impact on the ability to perform activities of daily living. In hemiparetic patients, the unrestricted and unguided repetition of a motor task may reinforce compensatory movements. Trunk restraint allowed the patients to use joint ranges that were present but not recruited during unrestrained reaching. This study aimed to compare the effect of trunk restraining versus balance training on improving active range of motion (ROM) during reach to grasp and hand function in stroke patients. Patients and methods: Forty -five stroke patients with age ranged from 40 to 55 years were included in the study. Patients were divided into three equal groups according to therapeutic intervention(GI, GII and GIII), GI received program of reach to grasp movements training during which compensatory movement of the trunk was prevented by trunk restraint, GII received the same program with balance training and without trunk restraint and GIII received the same program only. All patients were assessed for arm impairment using Fugl-Meyer scale, arm function using Upper Extremity Performance Test, gross and fine hand function using Box and Block test and Purdue Pegboard test respectively and for kinematic measures by two- dimensional motion analysis system during reach to grasp movement
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.21.08.Ph.D.2014.Na.T (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110065790000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.21.08.Ph.D.2014.Na.T (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 65790.CD Not for loan 01020110065790000

Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Physical Therapy for Neuromuscular and Neurosurgery

Back ground and Purpose: The ability to reach and grasp is a necessary component of many daily life functional tasks, hence reduced upper limb function has an impact on the ability to perform activities of daily living. In hemiparetic patients, the unrestricted and unguided repetition of a motor task may reinforce compensatory movements. Trunk restraint allowed the patients to use joint ranges that were present but not recruited during unrestrained reaching. This study aimed to compare the effect of trunk restraining versus balance training on improving active range of motion (ROM) during reach to grasp and hand function in stroke patients. Patients and methods: Forty -five stroke patients with age ranged from 40 to 55 years were included in the study. Patients were divided into three equal groups according to therapeutic intervention(GI, GII and GIII), GI received program of reach to grasp movements training during which compensatory movement of the trunk was prevented by trunk restraint, GII received the same program with balance training and without trunk restraint and GIII received the same program only. All patients were assessed for arm impairment using Fugl-Meyer scale, arm function using Upper Extremity Performance Test, gross and fine hand function using Box and Block test and Purdue Pegboard test respectively and for kinematic measures by two- dimensional motion analysis system during reach to grasp movement

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Local cover image