000 | 03641cam a22003374a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
008 | 011101s2001 dcuab b 000 0 eng | ||
020 | _a0309076498 | ||
040 |
_aDLC _cDLC _dDLC |
||
043 | _an-us--- | ||
050 | 0 | 0 |
_aHA201.12 _b.A125 2001 |
092 | 0 | 4 |
_a317.73 _bA11166 2001 _221 |
099 |
_a04 _a317.73 A11166 2001 |
||
245 | 0 | 4 |
_aThe 2000 Census : _binterim assessment / _cPanel to Review the 2000 Census ; Constance F. Citro, Daniel L. Cork, and Janet L. Norwood, editors ; Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council. |
260 |
_aWashington, DC : _bNational Academy Press, _cc2001. |
||
300 |
_axxi, 226 p. : _bill., maps ; _c23 cm. |
||
500 | _aAmerican Window | ||
504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 215-221). | ||
505 | 8 | _aMachine generated contents note: I Letter Report -- II Interim Report -- Executive Summary -- 1 Introduction -- Charge to the Panel -- Census Oversight: A Brief Review -- Availability of Information -- March Adjustment Decision -- Scope and Limitations of this Interim Report -- 2 Evaluation Issues -- Census Data in Context -- Error -- An Evaluation Program -- Summary -- 3 Census Operations: Overview -- Developing the Master Address File -- Questionnaire Delivery and Mail Return -- Outreach -- Field Follow-Up -- Data Processing -- 4 Census Operations: Assessment -- Overall Design and Execution -- Multiple Sources for MAF -- Participation in LUCA -- Redesigned Questionnaire and Mailing Strategy -- Paid Advertising and Partnerships -- Aggressive Recruitment of Enumerators -- Use of Contractors and Improved Technology -- Increased Use of Computers -- Population Coverage -- Coverage-Related Factors -- Conclusions -- Next Steps -- 5 Demographic Analysis -- Methodology: Overview -- The 2000 Estimates -- Uncertainty in Immigration Estimates -- Estimates by Race -- Other Estimates -- Conclusions -- 6 Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: Overview -- Coverage Patterns, 2000 and 1990 -- Dual-Systems Estimation -- A.C.E. Operations -- 7 Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: Assessment -- Conduct and Timing -- Household Noninterviews in the P-Sample -- Missing and Unresolved Data -- Quality of Matching -- Targeted Extended Search -- Post-Stratification -- Variance Estimates -- Final Match Codes and Rates -- Gross Errors -- Conclusions -- 8 Imputations and Late Additions -- A Puzzle -- People Requiring Imputation -- Late Additions -- Conclusions -- A Census Operations -- Master Address File -- Questionnaire Delivery and Mail Return -- Field Follow-Up -- Outreach Efforts -- Data Processing -- B Mail Returns -- Quality in 1990 -- Quality in 2000 -- 1990-2000 Differences in Mail Return Rates -- Conclusion -- C A.C.E. Operations -- Sampling, Address Listing, and Housing Unit Match -- P-Sample Interviewing -- Initial Matching and Targeted Extended Search -- Field Follow-Up and Final Matching -- Weighting and Imputation -- Post-Strata Estimation -- Glossary -- References -- Biographical Sketches of Panel Members and Staff. | |
651 | 0 |
_aUnited States _xCensus, 2000 _xEvaluation. |
|
651 | 0 |
_aUnited States _xCensus, 2000 _xMethodology. |
|
700 | 1 |
_aCitro, Constance F. _q(Constance Forbes), _d1942- |
|
700 | 1 | _aCork, Daniel L. | |
700 | 1 | _aNorwood, Janet Lippe. | |
710 | 2 |
_aNational Research Council (U.S.). _bPanel to Review the 2000 Census. |
|
856 | 4 | 1 |
_3Table of contents _uhttp://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/fy02/2001097857.html |
902 | _a1 | ||
905 |
_aEman _eRev. |
||
905 |
_aJamal _eCat. |
||
942 |
_2ddc _cBK |
||
999 |
_c114316 _d114316 |