000 03125nam a2200301Ia 4500
005 20250223033129.0
008 231030s9999 xx 000 0 und d
049 _aDeposit
082 _a613
097 _aPh.D
099 _aCai01.21.04.M.Sc.2022.Al.E
100 _aAlaa Samir Mohamed Bassuony ,
245 _aEffect of pulsed electromagnetic fieldversus tens on menstrual distress of primary dysmenorrea /
_cAlaa Samir Mohamed Bassuony ; Khadiga Sayed Abdelaziz , Hossam Eldin Hussien Kamel , Reham Ebrahim Hamoda
246 _aتـأثير العلاج بالمجال الكهرومغناطيسي المتقطع مقابل جهاز التنبيه الكهربي على الام عسر الطمث
260 _c2022.
502 _aThesis (M.Sc.)-Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Physical Therapy for Women’s Health
504 _aBibliography: p. 74-98.
520 _aCurrent study was conducted to determine effect of pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) versus transcutaneous electrical Nerve stimulation (TENS) on menstrual distress of primary dysmenorrhea. Forty female diagnosed as primary dysmenorrhea with normal menstrual cycle (certified gynecologist) their ages 18_24years, their body mass index (BMI) less than 29kg/m² with no medical or psychological problems, were selec&#116;ed randomly from Alexandria General Hospital (Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department), from 5April to 30 September 2021. The females were divided equally and randomly allocated within two groups of 20 per each; study group (G1) received PEMF of 50HZ and 60gauss at lumbosacral region (L4-S3) for 3 sessions per cycle for 3 consecutive cycles, each was 30minute, while female in a comfortable modified side lying with small paddings across curves, While control group (G2) received TENS using 100Hz with pulse width 95 microseconds, with intensity produced a comfortable perceptible paraesthesia without muscular contraction along 30minutes while female in supine and electrodes were bilaterally placed " ~ "5cm laterally to midline at umbilical level, study protocol applied twice per day for first two days of menses, along two successive menses. Primary dysmenorrhea was evaluated by Walidd score, Menstrual symptom questionnaire (MSQ) and measurement of concentration of prostaglandins level pre and post treatment of both groups. Obtained result has revealed a statistically significant decrease in prostaglandins values, Walidd score and menstrual symptom questionnaire in both groups, as well study group (G1) revealed a statistically significant improvement at all measures than control group (G2) (p<0,001). Conclusion: Based on the obtained study results, it’s concluded that both PEMF and TENS were effective modalities, but PEMF os more effective than TENS in treating primary dysmenorrhea
650 _aPhysical Therapy
653 _aTENS
700 _aReham Ebrahim Hamoda
856 _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905 _aMohamady
942 _cTH
_2ddc
999 _c164458
_d164458
336 _2rda content
_atext
337 _2rdamedia
_aUnmediated
338 _2rdacarrier
_avolume