000 | 05218namaa22004211i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20250504092036.0 | ||
008 | 250504s2024 ua a|||frm||| 000 0 eng d | ||
040 |
_aEG-GICUC _beng _cEG-GICUC _dEG-GICUC _erda |
||
041 | 0 |
_aeng _beng _bara |
|
049 | _aDeposit | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | _a617.6 |
092 |
_a617.6 _221 |
||
097 | _aM.Sc | ||
099 | _aCai01.09.03.M.Sc.2024.Mo.C | ||
100 | 0 |
_aMaysaa Mahmoud Mostafa Saad, _epreparation. |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aClinical performance of newly introduced self-cured universal adhesive versus light-cured universal adhesive for restoring cervical lesions in geriatric patients over one year : _ba randomized clinical tria / _cby Maysaa Mahmoud Mostafa Saad ; Supervisors Maha Abdelsalam ElBaz, Dina EzzEldin Mohamed. |
246 | 1 | 5 |
_aالأداء الاكلينيكي للمادة اللاصقة ذاتية المعالجة المقدمة حديثا مقارنة بالمادة اللاصقة المعالجة ضوئيا لعلاج الآفات العنقية في المرضى كبار السن على مدار عام : _bتجربة سريرية عشوائية / |
264 | 0 | _c2024. | |
300 |
_a88 pages : _billustrations ; _c25 cm. + _eCD. |
||
336 |
_atext _2rda content |
||
337 |
_aUnmediated _2rdamedia |
||
338 |
_avolume _2rdacarrier |
||
502 | _aThesis (M.Sc)-Cairo University, 2024. | ||
504 | _aBibliography: pages 71-86. | ||
520 | _aAim: This randomized clinical trial aimed to investigate the clinical performance of PALFIQUE universal adhesive (Tokuyama self-cure universal adhesive), Versus 3M ESPE™ Single bond Universal Adhesive, for restoring class V cavities in geriatric patients over one year. Methodology: A total of 28 geriatric participants randomly received 28 cervical carious restorations using either; PALFIQUE universal adhesive (Tokuyama self-cure universal adhesive) the intervention or 3M ESPE™ Single bond Universal Adhesive as the comparator. After cavity preparation, all cavities were etched using etch-and-rinse technique, then the universal adhesives the resin composite were utilized according to the manufacturer instructions. Restorations were evaluated using modified USPHS criteria by two blinded assessors at baseline, 3, 6. 9 and 12 months. They were analysed using Mann-Whitney U test for intergroup comparisons while intragroup comparisons were done using Friedman‘s test followed by Nemenyi post hoc test. The significance level was set at p ≤0.05 within all tests. Results: After 12 months there was no statistically significant difference between both materials regarding marginal adaptation, retention, marginal discoloration, post-operative hypersensitivity and secondary caries (P= 0.769, P=1, P = 0.796, P = 1, P = 1) respectively. Conclusion: The use of PALFIQUE universal adhesive (Tokuyama self-cure universal adhesive) is approved to show a similar clinical performance compared to 3M ESPE™ Single bond light-cure Universal Adhesive | ||
520 | _aAim: This randomized clinical trial aimed to investigate the clinical performance of PALFIQUE universal adhesive (Tokuyama self-cure universal adhesive), Versus 3M ESPE™ Single bond Universal Adhesive, for restoring class V cavities in geriatric patients over one year. Methodology: A total of 28 geriatric participants randomly received 28 cervical carious restorations using either; PALFIQUE universal adhesive (Tokuyama self-cure universal adhesive) as the intervention or 3M ESPE™ Single bond Universal Adhesive as the comparator. After cavity preparation, all cavities were etched using etch-and-rinse technique, then the universal adhesives and the resin composite were utilized according to the manufacturer instructions. Restorations were evaluated using modified USPHS criteria by two blinded assessors at baseline, 3, 6. 9 and 12 months. They were analysed using Mann-Whitney U test for intergroup comparisons while intragroup comparisons were done using Friedman’s test followed by Nemenyi post hoc test. The significance level was set at p ≤0.05 within all tests. Results: After 12 months there was no statistically significant difference between both materials regarding marginal adaptation, retention, marginal discoloration, post-operative hypersensitivity and secondary caries (P= 0.769, P=1, P = 0.796, P = 1, P = 1) respectively. Conclusion: The use of PALFIQUE universal adhesive (Tokuyama self-cure universal adhesive) is approved to show a similar clinical performance compared to 3M ESPE™ Single bond light-cure Universal Adhesive. | ||
530 | _aIssues also as CD. | ||
546 | _aText in English and abstract in Arabic & English. | ||
650 | 7 |
_aDentistry _2qrmak |
|
653 | 0 |
_aSelf-Cured Universal Adhesive _aLight-Cured Universal Adhesive _a3M ESPE™ |
|
700 | 0 |
_aMaha Abdelsalam ElBaz _ethesis advisor. |
|
700 | 0 |
_aDina EzzEldin Mohamed _ethesis advisor. |
|
900 |
_b01-01-2024 _cMaha Abdelsalam ElBaz _cDina EzzEldin Mohamed _dRasha Raafat Hassan _dWael Gamil _UCairo University _FFaculty of Dentistry _DDepartment of Restorative and Esthetic Dentistry |
||
905 | _aShimaa | ||
942 |
_2ddc _cTH _e21 _n0 |
||
999 | _c171840 |