| 000 | 02075cam a2200349 a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | EG-GiCUC | ||
| 005 | 20250223030239.0 | ||
| 008 | 100617s2010 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d | ||
| 040 |
_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC |
||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 049 | _aDeposite | ||
| 097 | _aPh.D | ||
| 099 | _aCai01.11.01.Ph.D.2010.En.F | ||
| 100 | 0 | _aEngy Wagdy Megalley Samuel | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aFiberoptic intubation in the pediatric difficult airway: _bA comparison between general anesthesia and the non- asleep techique / _cEngy Wagdy Megalley Samuel : Supervised Foudan Fahim Shaltout , Maha Gamil Hanna , Manal Mohammed Elgohary |
| 246 | 1 | 5 |
_aتركيب انبوبة حنجرية بواسطة منظار الالياف الضوئية فى الممر الهوائى الصعب للاطفال : _bمقارنة بين المخدر العام وطريقة عدم النوم |
| 260 |
_aCairo : _bEngy Wagdy Megalley Samuel , _c2010 |
||
| 300 |
_a125p.: _bcharts , facsimiles ; _c25cm |
||
| 502 | _aThesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Anaesthesia | ||
| 520 | _aWe performed the current study to compare general anesthesia (GA) and the non- asleep (NA) technique for fiberoptic tracheal intubation (TI) in pediatric patients with anticipated difficult airway . Patients in GA group (n=20) were intubated using the fiberoptic broncoscope after induction of general anesthesia using inhalation of sevoflurane 3-5% . Patients in the NA group (n=20)had sedation using ketamine and midazolam with the maximum of (2 and 0.01 mg/kg)respectively and airway topicalization using lidocaine 2 % via the spray as you go technique | ||
| 530 | _aIssued also as CD | ||
| 653 | 4 | _aFiberoptic | |
| 653 | 4 | _aNon - asleep technique | |
| 653 | 4 | _aPediatric difficult airway | |
| 700 | 0 |
_aFoudan Fahim Shaltout , _eSupervisor |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aMaha Gamil Hanna , _eSupervisor |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aManal Mohammed Elgohary , _eSupervisor |
|
| 856 | _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf | ||
| 905 |
_aNazla _eRevisor |
||
| 905 |
_aSoheir _eCataloger |
||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cTH |
||
| 999 |
_c30704 _d30704 |
||