| 000 | 01879cam a2200349 a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | EG-GiCUC | ||
| 005 | 20250223030303.0 | ||
| 008 | 101004s2010 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d | ||
| 040 |
_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC |
||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 049 | _aDeposite | ||
| 097 | _aPh.D | ||
| 099 | _aCai01.11.20.Ph.D.2010.Mo.C | ||
| 100 | 0 | _aMohammad Alaa Eldin | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aComparative study between key hole and limited approaches versus the extended skull base approaches for huge sellar and suprasellar masses / _cMohammad Alaa Eldin ; Supervised Mostafa Wagih Kotb , Helmy Abdelhalim , Mohammad Shihab |
| 246 | 1 | 5 | _aدراسة مقارنة ما بين المداخل الجراحية المحدودة والمداخل الجراحية الموسعة الجمجمة فى اورام المنطقة السرجية وفوق السرجية |
| 260 |
_aCairo : _bMohammad Alaa Eldin , _c2010 |
||
| 300 |
_a176P. : _bchars , facsimiles ; _c25cm |
||
| 502 | _aThesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Neurosurgery | ||
| 520 | _aThe aim of this work is to study the indications versatility clinical and radiological results of the supraorbital approach the orbitozygomatic approch in the treatment of different sellar and anterir cranial fossa lesions and comparing these results with those obtained by the standard pterional approach . The results will hopefully be guidance to the advantages disadvantages and limitations of both approaches | ||
| 530 | _aIssued also as CD | ||
| 653 | 4 | _aMinimal invasive surgery | |
| 653 | 4 | _aPterional | |
| 653 | 4 | _aSupraorbital | |
| 700 | 0 |
_aHelmy Abdelhalim , _eSupervisor |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aMohammad Shihab , _eSupervisor |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aMostafa Wagih Kotb , _eSupervisor |
|
| 856 | _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf | ||
| 905 |
_aNazla _eRevisor |
||
| 905 |
_aSoheir _eCataloger |
||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cTH |
||
| 999 |
_c31593 _d31593 |
||