| 000 | 01808cam a2200349 a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | EG-GiCUC | ||
| 005 | 20250223030306.0 | ||
| 008 | 101010s2010 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d | ||
| 040 |
_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC |
||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 049 | _aDeposite | ||
| 097 | _aM.Sc | ||
| 099 | _aCai01.11.34.M.Sc.2010.Is.E | ||
| 100 | 0 | _aIsmail Mohamed Saber | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aExtracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy vs ureteroscopy in the treatment of lower ureteric stones : _bEfficacy and complications / _cIsmail Mohamed Saber ; Supervised Ahmed Ali Morsy , Amr Salah Eldin Fayad , Ahmed Elsayed Elshenoufy |
| 246 | 1 | 5 |
_aدراسة مقارنة بين إستخدام جهاز الموجات التصادمية ومنظار الحالب في علاج حصوات أسفل الحالب : _bالكفاءة والمضاعفات |
| 260 |
_aCairo : _bIsmail Mohamed Saber , _c2010 |
||
| 300 |
_a140 P. : _bcharts , facsimiles ; _c25cm |
||
| 502 | _aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Urology | ||
| 520 | _aThe results showed that ureteroscopy is preferable than SWL in terms of stone free rate radiation exposure procedure time hospital stay ( SWL need repeated sessions ) in addition to more follow up visits required for SWL versus fewer follow up visits needed for ureteroscopy while both modalities had nearly the same complications | ||
| 530 | _aIssued also as CD | ||
| 653 | 4 | _aDistal ureteral calculi | |
| 653 | 4 | _aShock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy | |
| 653 | 4 | _aUrology | |
| 700 | 0 |
_aAhmed Ali Morsy , _eSupervisor |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aAhmed Elsayed Elshenoufy , _eSupervisor |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aAmr Salah Eldin Fayad , _eSupervisor |
|
| 856 | _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf | ||
| 905 |
_aEnas _eCataloger |
||
| 905 |
_aNazla _eRevisor |
||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cTH |
||
| 999 |
_c31677 _d31677 |
||