| 000 | 01906cam a2200349 a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | EG-GiCUC | ||
| 005 | 20250223030833.0 | ||
| 008 | 130521s2013 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d | ||
| 040 |
_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC |
||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 049 | _aDeposite | ||
| 097 | _aPh.D | ||
| 099 | _aCai01.11.12.Ph.D.2013.Mo.F | ||
| 100 | 0 | _aMohamed Ahmed Abdeltawab | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aFurlow ( Z ) palatoplasty versus two - flaps paltoplasty in cleft palate patients / _cMohamed Ahmed Abdeltawab ; Supervised Tarek Kamel , Usama Abdelnaseer , Hossam Eldessouky |
| 246 | 1 | 5 | _aمقارنة بين تجميل سقف الحلق بطريقتى الرقعة المزدوجة والرقعة باستخدام حرف الزد لمرضى سقف الحلق المشقوق |
| 260 |
_aCairo : _bMohamed Ahmed Abdeltawab , _c2013 |
||
| 300 |
_a78P. : _bcharts , facsimiles ; _c25cm |
||
| 502 | _aThesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of E. N. T. | ||
| 520 | _aMany methods of cleft palate repair have been described . Two effective methods are commonly used for repair of soft palate clefs : the two flaps ( Wardill - Kilner V - Y pushback ) and the Furlow double opposing Z - plasty ; each has advantages and disadvantages . The aim of this study was to compare between the V - Y push back technique and the Furlow Z - plasty technique regarding effectiveness in palatal Reconstruction , improvement of velopharyngeal closure and Eustachian tube function in cases of incomplete cleft palate | ||
| 530 | _aIssued also as CD | ||
| 653 | 4 | _aCleft palate | |
| 653 | 4 | _aFurlow ( Z ) plasty | |
| 653 | 4 | _aPalatoplasty | |
| 700 | 0 |
_aHossam Eldessouky , _eSupervisor |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aTarek Kamel , _eSupervisor |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aUsama Abdelnaseer , _eSupervisor |
|
| 856 | _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf | ||
| 905 |
_aFatma _eCataloger |
||
| 905 |
_aNazla _eRevisor |
||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cTH |
||
| 999 |
_c42982 _d42982 |
||