| 000 | 01871cam a2200337 a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | EG-GiCUC | ||
| 005 | 20250223030920.0 | ||
| 008 | 131228s2011 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d | ||
| 040 |
_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC |
||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 049 | _aDeposite | ||
| 097 | _aM.Sc | ||
| 099 | _aCai01.09.06.M.Sc.2011.Mo.C | ||
| 100 | 0 | _aMohammed Moustafa Mansour Albayomi | |
| 245 | 1 | 2 |
_aA comparative in vitro study for evaluation of two types of frictionless brackets and one type of conventional bracket / _cMohammed Moustafa Mansour ; Supervised Amany Hassan , Eman Mohie Eldin |
| 246 | 1 | 5 | _aقوة الاحتكاك فى نوعين من الحاصرات قليلة الاحتكاك و نوع من الحاصرات التقليدية |
| 260 |
_aCairo : _bMohammed Moustafa Mansour Albayomi , _c2011 |
||
| 300 |
_a94 Leaves : _bcharts , facsimiles ; _c30cm |
||
| 502 | _aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Orthodontics | ||
| 520 | _aThe aim of this study was to evaluate and compare, the kinetic frictional force between two recent generation of frictionless brackets (fx SWLF and Damon 3MX), and one conventional bracket (Mini 2000). Material and methods: Seventy-two maxillary right stainless steel canine brackets, with slot size 0.022x0.028-inch, were used. The brackets were equally divided into three groups; Group {u2160} for the fx SWLF brackets, group {u2161} for the Damon 3 MX (self-ligated) brackets, while group {u2162} was for Mini 2000 conventional brackets | ||
| 530 | _aIssued also as CD | ||
| 653 | 4 | _aArchwire | |
| 653 | 4 | _aFriction | |
| 653 | 4 | _aSynergy | |
| 700 | 0 |
_aAmany Hassan Abdelghany , _eSupervisor |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aEman Mohie Eldin , _eSupervisor |
|
| 856 | _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf | ||
| 905 |
_aNazla _eRevisor |
||
| 905 |
_aSamia _eCataloger |
||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cTH |
||
| 999 |
_c44632 _d44632 |
||