| 000 | 02009cam a2200325 a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | EG-GiCUC | ||
| 005 | 20250223031146.0 | ||
| 008 | 150225s2014 ua f m 000 0 eng d | ||
| 040 |
_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC |
||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 049 | _aDeposite | ||
| 097 | _aM.Sc | ||
| 099 | _aCai01.03.04.M.Sc.2014.Ma.R | ||
| 100 | 0 | _aMariem Karam Kamel | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 |
_aThe role of the European union in democratic transition and consolidation in Poland and Egypt : _bComparative analysis / _cMariem Karam Kamel ; Supervised Mostafa Elwi Saif |
| 246 | 1 | 5 |
_aدور الاتحاد الأوروبى فى التحول الديموقراطى و توطيد الديموقراطية فى بولندا و مصر : _bتحليل مقارن |
| 260 |
_aCairo : _bMariem Karam Kamel , _c2014 |
||
| 300 |
_a147 P. ; _c25cm |
||
| 502 | _aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Economics and Political Science - Department of Political Science | ||
| 520 | _aThe weight of EU leverage differs in both Poland and Egypt, the EU leverage in Poland has evolved since 1989 until polish membership in EU in 2004, while in the Egyptian case, the EU economic linkage increased but without political leverage, one can notice the EU mediation after 30 June could be a matter of leverage in Egypt democratic transition. The EU instruments in Poland were evolved from negotiable attitude to conditional according to polish achievement in democratic transition, while in the Egyptian case; the EU hesitated between conditionality and negotiations. Moreover, Political transition and consolidation in Poland were paralleled to integration into EU which made democratic transformation smoother than in the Egyptian transformation | ||
| 530 | _aIssued also as CD | ||
| 653 | 4 | _aDemocracy | |
| 653 | 4 | _aDemocratization | |
| 653 | 4 | _aRevolution | |
| 700 | 0 |
_aMostafa Elwi Saif , _eSupervisor |
|
| 856 | _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf | ||
| 905 |
_aNazla _eRevisor |
||
| 905 |
_aSamia _eCataloger |
||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cTH |
||
| 999 |
_c49572 _d49572 |
||