000			02108cam a2200349 a 4500
003			EG-GiCUC
005			20250223031203.0
008			150328s2014 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d
040			_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC
041	0		_aeng
049			_aDeposite
097			_aM.Sc
099			_aCai01.09.13.M.Sc.2014.Mo.I
100	0		_aMohammed Abdullah Bayazeed
245	1	0	_aInfluence of periosteal free graft on bone healing / _cMohammed Abdullah Bayazeed ; Supervised Mohammed Amin Hindy , Atef Abdelhameed Fouda , Nagla'a Abdelwahed
246	1	5	_aتأثير الطعم السمحاقى الحر على شفاء العظم
260			_aCairo : _bMohammed Abdullah Bayazeed , _c2014
300			_a91 Leaves : _bcharts , facsimiles ; _c30cm
502			_aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
520			_aObjective: This study was performed to compare between the influence of fragmented periosteal graft and covering periosteal graft on bone healing. Methods: Twenty healthy patients were subjected to removal of impacted mesioangular lower third molar. Those patients were divided into two equal groups according to the application of the periosteal free grafts on the socket. Group (I) comprised ten patients, in whom the periosteal free grafts were sutured to the mouth of the socket after odontectomy of the tooth with cambium layer facing the socket. Group (II) comprised ten patients, in whom the periosteal free grafts were fragmented in Petri dish and applied inside the socket. Conclusion: There was no difference between the two techniques of the free periosteal graft on bone healing
530			_aIssued also as CD
653		4	_aBone Healing
653		4	_aFree Periosteal Graft
653		4	_aPeriosteum
700	0		_aAtef Abdelhameed Fouda , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aMohammed Amin Hindy , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aNagla'a Abdelwahed , _eSupervisor
856			_uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905			_aNazla _eRevisor
905			_aSoheir _eCataloger
942			_2ddc _cTH
999			_c50092 _d50092