000 02337cam a2200349 a 4500
003 EG-GiCUC
005 20250223031212.0
008 150408s2014 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d
040 _aEG-GiCUC
_beng
_cEG-GiCUC
041 0 _aeng
049 _aDeposite
097 _aPh.D
099 _aCai01.21.09.Ph.D.2014.Ab.E
100 0 _aAbeer Abdelfttah Ali
245 1 0 _aEffect of body physique on postural parameters in healthy subjects /
_cAbeer Abdelfttah Ali ; Supervised Fatma Sedik Amin , Marzouk Elleithy , Ahmed Gneidy
246 1 5 _aتأثير بنية الجسم على معايير القوام فى الأشخاص الأصحاء
260 _aCairo :
_bAbeer Abdelfttah Ali ,
_c2014
300 _a142 P. :
_bcharts , facsimiles ;
_c25cm
502 _aThesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Basic Science
520 _aIn recent years, body physique has been of growingconcern to researchers due to observations of its relation to differentskeletal abnormalities and systemic diseases. To investigate theeffect of body physique on postural parameters in healthy subjects. A prospective study investigated postural parameters of sixty healthy subjects (17 - 25) years, BMI ({u02C2} 30) kg \ m2. Lordotic angle ITL - ILS (max) in males showed a significant increase inendomorph (46.75 ±3.89) than ectomorph and mesomorph (31.4 ± 1.73) (35.25 ± 1.48) respectively, whileit showed no significant difference infemales. There was no statistical difference between the three groups regarding the other parameters {trunk imbalance, pelvic tilt, pelvic torsion, surface rotation (rms), lateral deviation (rms), and kyphotic angle ICT - ITL (max)}. Females of the ectomorph group showed lower trunk imbalance (2.5 ± 0.4), higher surface rotation (3.6 ± 0.7) and lordotic angle ITL - ILS (max) (48.1 ± 3.93) thanmales {(9.2 ± 1.26), (2.5 ± 0.37 ), and ( 31.4 ± 1.73 )} respectively
530 _aIssued also as CD
653 4 _aBody physique
653 4 _aPostural parameters
653 4 _aTrunk imbalance
700 0 _aAhmed Gneidy ,
_eSupervisor
700 0 _aFatma Sedik Amin ,
_eSupervisor
700 0 _aMarzouk Elleithy ,
_eSupervisor
856 _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905 _aNazla
_eRevisor
905 _aSamia
_eCataloger
942 _2ddc
_cTH
999 _c50369
_d50369