000 02675cam a2200313 a 4500
003 EG-GiCUC
008 150418s2014 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d
040 _aEG-GiCUC
_beng
_cEG-GiCUC
041 0 _aeng
049 _aDeposite
097 _aM.Sc
099 _aCai01.13.05.M.Sc.2014.Ib.N
100 0 _aIbrahim Ragab Attia Sallam
245 1 0 _aNumerical evaluation of Tie-force method for design of reinforced concrete structures against progressive collapse /
_cIbrahim Ragab Attia Sallam ; Supervised Hamed M. Salem , Islam M. Ehabbal
246 1 5 _aتقييم عددى لطريقة قوى الشداد المستخدمة فى تصميم المنشأت الخرسانية لمقاومة الانهيار المتتابع
260 _aCairo :
_bIbrahim Ragab Attia Sallam ,
_c2014
300 _a261 , 70 P. :
_bcharts , facsimiles ;
_c30cm
502 _aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Engineering - Department of Civil Engineering
520 _aIn the current study numerical evaluation of Tie-Force method is carried out for design of reinforced concrete structures against progressive collapse. The structure was designed according to Egyptian Code of Practice (ECP). Fully nonlinear dynamic analysis for the structure is carried out using Applied Element Method. According to UFC code, primary vertical structural element is removed and structure behavior is investigated. The results are compared to the UFC limits which are rotation of beams, columns and joints. Also the effect of lateral load direction was investigated. The results shows that the designed reinforced concrete structures designed according to ECP satisfy BS in all vertical and horizontal ties. The designed reinforced concrete structures designed according to ECP satisfy UFC in all vertical ties but not satisfy horizontal ties. The required reinforcements for ties in slabs are greater than the minimum limits of reinforcement of ECP. The designed reinforced concrete structures designed according to ECP and tied according to BS met the UFC code limits. No progressive collapse was occurred in any case of removal for the designed reinforced concrete structures designed according to ECP and tied according to BS. Both of tying system for the designed reinforced concrete structures are safe but BS tying system is more economic than UFC tying system
530 _aIssued also as CD
653 4 _aAPM
653 4 _aProgressive Collapse
653 4 _aTie-Force
700 0 _aHamed Mohamed Mahmoud Salem ,
_eSupervisor
700 0 _aIslam Mohamed Elhabbal ,
_eSupervisor
905 _aNazla
_eRevisor
905 _aSoheir
_eCataloger
942 _2ddc
_cTH
999 _c50488
_d50488