| 000 | 02045cam a2200337 a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | EG-GiCUC | ||
| 005 | 20250223031224.0 | ||
| 008 | 150506s2014 ua h f m 000 0 eng d | ||
| 040 |
_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC |
||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 049 | _aDeposite | ||
| 097 | _aPh.D | ||
| 099 | _aCai01.09.09.Ph.D.2014.Am.C | ||
| 100 | 0 | _aAmr Salaheldin Gomaa | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aComparative study of the effect of two different implant designs in implant supported mandibular partial overdentures / _cAmr Salaheldin Gomaa ; Supervised Mohamed Sabry AbdelAziz Badawy , Ahmed Fahmy |
| 246 | 1 | 5 | _aدراسة مقارنة بين تصميمين مختلفين من الغرسات علي الاطقم المحمولة الجزئية السفلية |
| 260 |
_aCairo : _bAmr Salaheldin Gomaa , _c2014 |
||
| 300 |
_a190 Leaves : _bfacsimiles ; _c30cm |
||
| 502 | _aThesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Prosthodontics | ||
| 520 | _aThe present study was conducted on fourteen partially edentulous patients selected from the outpatient clinic of the Prosthetic Department, of Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Cairo University. For all patients, examination charts were prepared with full personal, medical and dental history as well as radiographic records Patients are divided into two groups; each group received one implant in the distal extension area with a locator attachment. Group A; received implant with conventional design (Non {u2013}plate form switching) and group B; received implant with plate form switching design and then followed by an implant supported mandibular partial over denture | ||
| 530 | _aIssued also as CD | ||
| 653 | 4 | _aImplant Supported Mandibular Partial | |
| 653 | 4 | _aOverdentures | |
| 653 | 4 | _aTwo Different Implant Designs | |
| 700 | 0 |
_aAhmed Fahmy , _eSupervisor |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aMohamed Sabry Abdelaziz Badawy , _eSupervisor |
|
| 856 | _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf | ||
| 905 |
_aAml _eCataloger |
||
| 905 |
_aNazla _eRevisor |
||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cTH |
||
| 999 |
_c50790 _d50790 |
||