000 | 01846cam a2200337 a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | EG-GiCUC | ||
005 | 20250223031226.0 | ||
008 | 150509s2014 ua dho f m 000 0 eng d | ||
040 |
_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC |
||
041 | 0 | _aeng | |
049 | _aDeposite | ||
097 | _aM.Sc | ||
099 | _aCai01.09.09.M.Sc.2014.Mo.E | ||
100 | 0 | _aMohamed Ayman Yosry Abdelrahim Hamad | |
245 | 1 | 4 |
_aThe effect of two impression techniques on the fit of screw retained implant frameworks / _cMohamed Ayman Yosry Abdelrahim Hamad ; Supervised Mahmood Alfar , Amr Hosny Elkhadem |
246 | 1 | 5 | _aتاثير تقنيتين فى الانطباع على ثبات الاطار المثبت على براغى الاسنان |
260 |
_aCairo : _bMohamed Ayman Yosry Abdelrahim Hamad , _c2014 |
||
300 |
_a123 P. : _bcharts , facsimiles , photographs ; _c30cm |
||
502 | _aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Prosthodontics | ||
520 | _aAim of the study: this is an in vitro study To compare two types of impression techniques the primary splinted impression technique and the non splinted technique to evaluate which type produces a more passive metal framework for framework for fixed screw retained prosthesis . Conclusion: Under the limitations of the present study, the splinted impression technique yielded statistically significant more accurate working casts than the non-splinted technique especially for the lower arch | ||
530 | _aIssued also as CD | ||
653 | 4 | _aImplant supported prosthesis | |
653 | 4 | _aPassive fit | |
653 | 4 | _aScrew retained prosthesis | |
700 | 0 |
_aAmr Hosny Elkhadem , _eSupervisor |
|
700 | 0 |
_aMahmood Alfar , _eSupervisor |
|
856 | _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf | ||
905 |
_aNazla _eRevisor |
||
905 |
_aSamia _eCataloger |
||
942 |
_2ddc _cTH |
||
999 |
_c50854 _d50854 |