000 02393cam a2200337 a 4500
003 EG-GiCUC
005 20250223031244.0
008 150704s2014 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d
040 _aEG-GiCUC
_beng
_cEG-GiCUC
041 0 _aeng
049 _aDeposite
097 _aPh.D
099 _aCai01.21.08.Ph.D.2014.Ra.T
100 0 _aRania Mohamed Tawfik Rashad
245 1 0 _aTranscranial direct current stimulation versus neuromuscular electrical stimulation on hand function in stroke patients /
_cRania Mohamed Tawfik Rashad ; Supervised Gehan Mousa Ahmed , Ebtesam Mohamed Fahmy
246 1 5 _aالتنبيه بالتيار المباشر عبر الجمجمة مقابل التنبيه الكهربى العصبى العضلى على وظيفة اليد فى مرضى السكتة الدماغية
260 _aCairo :
_bRania Mohamed Tawfik Rashad ,
_c2014
300 _a162 P. :
_bcharts , facsimiles ;
_c25cm
502 _aThesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Neuromuscular and neurosurgery
520 _aBackground and Objective: More than 60% of stroke survivors suffer from persistent neurological deficits that impair activities of daily living. Electrical stimulation is shown to be effective in enhancing the upper extremity functional recovery in stroke patients. The goal of this study was to compare between the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation and neuromuscular electrical stimulation on hand function in stroke patients Conclusion: Central and peripheral stimulation are effective modalities in improving hand function post stroke. Central stimulation is more effective than peripheral stimulation in improving functional hand motor skills while peripheral stimulation is more effective in improving hand grip strength, pinch strength and ROM of wrist extension. Both types of stimulation are effective in improving gross manual dexterity. Both types of stimulation had no significant effect on the degree of hand spasticity
530 _aIssued also as CD
653 4 _aElectrical stimulation
653 4 _aHand function
653 4 _aStroke
700 0 _aEbtesam Mohamed Fahmy ,
_eSupervisor
700 0 _aGehan Mousa Ahmed ,
_eSupervisor
856 _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905 _aNazla
_eRevisor
905 _aSoheir
_eCataloger
942 _2ddc
_cTH
999 _c51527
_d51527