000			02839cam a2200337 a 4500
003			EG-GiCUC
005			20250223031347.0
008			151205s2015 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d
040			_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC
041	0		_aeng
049			_aDeposite
097			_aM.Sc
099			_aCai01.21.09.M.Sc.2015.Na.I
100	0		_aNagwa Sayed Abdelwahed Hasan
245	1	0	_aInfluence of microcurrent electrical stimulation on blood flow in normal subjects / _cNagwa Sayed Abdelwahed Hasan ; Supervised Kadria Hosny Mohamed , Marzouk Abdelfattah Ellethy
246	1	5	_aتأثيرالتنبية بالتيارالكهربائى المتناهى فى الصغر على تدفق الدم لدى الأشخاص الطبيعيين
260			_aCairo : _bNagwa Sayed Abdelwahed Hasan , _c2015
300			_a88 P. : _bcharts . facsimiles ; _c25cm
502			_aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Basic Science
520			_aBlood flow is an important factor which can affect the repair and healing of injured tissues. There are many factors that may affect the blood flow. Electrical stimulation has been showed to produce long term changes in vascularization at the capillary level. This study was done to investigate the influence of microcurrent electrical stimulation (MES) on blood flow in normal subjects. Thirty healthy participants with mean age (28.77 ± 3.501) years, and the mean value of their body mass index was (23.20 ± 1.332) kg/m. Participants were assigned randomly into two equal groups; group (A) received high frequency MES with 125 Hz frequency for 30 min. while, group (B) received low MES with frequency 40 Hz for 30 min. All participants in both groups were assessed for resistivity Index, Total blood flow volume, mean blood flow velocity and peak systolic velocity by using ultrasonic doppler before and immediately after microcurrent application. Microcurrent electrical stimulation showed statistical significant improvement in blood flow resistivity index, total blood flow volume, mean blood flow velocity and peak systolic velocity in posterior tibial artery of normal healthy subjects, with significant statistical difference by using high frequency versus low frequency. The study revealed that both high frequency and low frequency microcurrent electrical stimulation were effective for improving the blood flow on the posterior tibial artery in normal healthy subjects
530			_aIssued also as CD
653		4	_aBlood flow
653		4	_aMicrocurrent electrical stimulation
653		4	_aResistivity index
700	0		_aKadria Hosny Mohamed , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aMarzouk Abdelfattah Ellethy , _eSupervisor
856			_uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905			_aNazla _eRevisor
905			_aSamia _eCataloger
942			_2ddc _cTH
999			_c53724 _d53724