| 000 | 02731cam a2200349 a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | EG-GiCUC | ||
| 005 | 20250223031445.0 | ||
| 008 | 160322s2015 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d | ||
| 040 |
_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC |
||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 049 | _aDeposite | ||
| 097 | _aM.Sc | ||
| 099 | _aCai01.11.31.M.Sc.2015.Ay.W | ||
| 100 | 0 | _aAyman Elsayed Elaraby Aboelregal | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aWhole body diffusion imaging with background signal suppression (DWIBS) versus FDG PET/CT in lymphoma patients : _bComparative study / _cAyman Elsayed Elaraby Aboelregal ; Supervised Ahmed Mohamed Wafaie , Magdy Hassan Kotb , Mohamed Samy Saied Elazab |
| 246 | 1 | 5 |
_aدور التصوير بالرنين المغناطيسي بطريقة الانتشار على الجسم كله مصحوبا بخاصية محو خلفية الجسم في مرضى الأورام الليمفاوية : _bدراسة مقارنة مع المسح الّذري البوزيتروني المدمج مع الأشعة المقطعية |
| 260 |
_aCairo : _bAyman Elsayed Elaraby Aboelregal , _c2015 |
||
| 300 |
_a163 P. : _bcharts , facsimiles ; _c25cm |
||
| 502 | _aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Radio-diagnosis | ||
| 520 | _aPurpose: We performed a comparison between the diagnostic value of F-18-FDG PET-CT and WB-MRI/DWIBS for detecting nodal and extra-nodal lymphomatous infiltrates. Patients & Methods: thirty two patients with pathologically proven lymphoma (HL or NHL) underwent both F-18-FDG PET-CT and WB-MRI/DWIBS, to detect nodal and extra-nodal lymphomatous infiltration. Both F-18-FDG PET-CT and WB- MRI/DWIBS were independently interpreted using visual (qualitative) and quantitative analysis in the term of SUV max and ADC mean respectively. Using pathological data and / or combined clinical / radiological follow up as a reference standard, Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and overall accuracy were estimated for both techniques. Results: F-18 FDG PET-CT demonstrated clearly higher parameters than WB- MRI/DWIBS. With the latter one showed a limited superiority in the context of bone marrow assessment. Conclusion: F-18 FDG PET-CT is better than WB-MRI/DWIBS in evaluation of lymphomas. The latter one may play a complementary role especially in assessment of BM infiltration. | ||
| 530 | _aIssued also as CD | ||
| 653 | 4 | _aF-18-FDG PET-CT | |
| 653 | 4 | _alymphomas | |
| 653 | 4 | _aWB-MRI | |
| 700 | 0 |
_aAhmed Mohamed Wafaie , _eSupervisor |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aMagdy Hassan Kotb , _eSupervisor |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aMohamed Samy Saied Elazab , _eSupervisor |
|
| 856 | _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf | ||
| 905 |
_aNazla _eRevisor |
||
| 905 |
_aSoheir _eCataloger |
||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cTH |
||
| 999 |
_c55676 _d55676 |
||