| 000 | 02758cam a2200325 a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | EG-GiCUC | ||
| 008 | 160329s2015 ua h f m 000 0 eng d | ||
| 040 |
_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC |
||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 049 | _aDeposite | ||
| 097 | _aM.Sc | ||
| 099 | _aCai01.11.24.M.Sc.2015.Am.A | ||
| 100 | 0 | _aAmal Nasr Hashem | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aAnterior segment optical coherence tomography to assess accuracy of the flap after laser insitu keratomileusis : _bA comparative study between femtolasik and m2 microkeratome / _cAmal Nasr Hashem ; Supervised Riad Bahey Eldin Shalash , Mostafa Ali Elhelw , Ahmed Hassanein Ebeid |
| 246 | 1 | 5 |
_aدور الماسح الضوئى التوافقى الامامى فى تقييم دقة سمك الجنيح الاضافى المتحرك بعد عملية الليزك : _bدراسة مقارنة بين الفيمتوليزك و قاطع القرنية المجهرى |
| 260 |
_aCairo : _bAmal Nasr Hashem , _c2015 |
||
| 300 |
_a70 P. : _bfacsimiles ; _c25cm |
||
| 502 | _aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine- Department of Ophthalmology | ||
| 520 | _aPurpose: To compare the thickness of the LASIK flap created by the mechanical microkeratome Moria M2, and that created with femtosecond laser FS150, using anterior segment OCT (Optovue, RTVue). Design: prospective comparative randomized study done at Rowad Corrective centre (RCC). Methods: Flaps were created using the Femtosecond laser Intralase FS150 (average intended flap 113æm± 6.71) in 20 eyes, in the other 20 eyes the flaps were created using mechanical microkeratome Moria M2 90. Flap thickness was measured using AS-OCT 2-4 weeks postoperative (average on 23rd day). Results: In group A: The mean flap thickness was 107om ± 8.37(ranging from 83om to 138 om), the deviation from the 113.5om ± 6.71 mean intended flap thickness was -6.5±9.97 (From -17 to 10). The mean postoperative spherical error was 0.04±0.40(ranging from -0.5 to 1), , cylindrical error was -0.36±0.15 (ranging from -0.5 to 0), the mean postoperative spherical equivalent was -0.14±0.37 (ranging from -0.75 to 0.75) UCVA was 0.95±0.89 (0.8 to 1.25). The mean flap thickness was 144.5æm±19.06SD (ranging from 108æm to 188), we considered the intended flap thickness was 100æm, so the mean deviation from intended flap thickness was 34.5±19.06( from 7 to 59) | ||
| 530 | _aIssued also as CD | ||
| 653 | 4 | _aFemtosecond laser | |
| 653 | 4 | _aLaser insitu keratomileusis | |
| 653 | 4 | _aMicrokeratome versus | |
| 700 | 0 |
_aAhmed Hassanein Ebeid , _eSupervisor |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aMostafa Ali Elhelw , _eSupervisor |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aRiad Bahey Eldin Shalash , _eSupervisor |
|
| 905 |
_aAml _eCataloger |
||
| 905 |
_aNazla _eRevisor |
||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cTH |
||
| 999 |
_c55774 _d55774 |
||