| 000 | 03130cam a2200337 a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | EG-GiCUC | ||
| 005 | 20250223031523.0 | ||
| 008 | 160619s2015 ua do f m 000 0 eng d | ||
| 040 |
_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC |
||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 049 | _aDeposite | ||
| 097 | _aM.Sc | ||
| 099 | _aCai01.09.09.M.Sc.2015.La.M | ||
| 100 | 0 | _aLamiaa Said Zaki Abdelsalam | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aMinimally invasive management of compromised molar site with different implant designs and superstructures : _bIn vitro study / _cLamiaa Said Zaki Abdelsalam ; Supervised Lamiaa Sayed Kheiralla , Mona Atteya Alagroudy |
| 246 | 1 | 5 |
_aالحد الأدنى من التدخل فى معالجة مقر الضرس المنقوص بتصميمات غرس و بنية فوقية مختلفة : _bدراسة فى المختبر |
| 260 |
_aCairo : _bLamiaa Said Zaki Abdelsalam , _c2015 |
||
| 300 |
_a140 P. : _bcharts , photographs ; _c25cm |
||
| 502 | _aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Prosthodontics | ||
| 520 | _aThe aim of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical response of the peri-implant bone to standard, short wide and double mini implants replacing missing molar supporting either hybrid ceramic crowns (Lava Ultimate restorative) or full metal crowns under 2 different loading conditions (axial and off axial loading ) using strain gauge analysis. 3 single molar implant designs: (1) single, 3.8 mm (regular) diameter implant, (2) single, 5.8 mm (wide) diameter implant, and (3) two 2.5 mm diameter (double) implants connected through a single-molar crown were embedded in epoxy resin by the aid of a surveyor to ensure their parallelism. Each implant supported full metal crowns made of Ni-Cr alloy and hybrid ceramic with standardized dimensions. Epoxy resin casts were prepared to receive 4 strain gauges around each implant design, on the buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal surfaces. Results were analyzed statistically. Results showed that implant design has statistically significant effect on peri implant microstrains; where the standard implant showed the highest mean microstrain values followed by double mini implants, while the short-wide implant showed the lowest mean microstrain values. Concerning the superstructure material, implants supporting lava ultimate crowns had statistically significant higher mean microstrain values than those supporting full metal crowns. Concerning the load direction, off-axial loading caused uneven distribution of load with statistically significant higher microstrain values on the site of off axial loading (distal surface) than the axial loading. Implant design, superstructure material and load direction significantly affect peri-implant microstrains. | ||
| 530 | _aIssued also as CD | ||
| 653 | 4 | _aMini implants | |
| 653 | 4 | _aShort wide implants | |
| 653 | 4 | _aStandard implants | |
| 700 | 0 |
_aLamiaa Sayed Kheiralla , _eSupervisor |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aMona Atteya Alagroudy , _eSupervisor |
|
| 856 | _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf | ||
| 905 |
_aNazla _eRevisor |
||
| 905 |
_aSamia _eCataloger |
||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cTH |
||
| 999 |
_c56968 _d56968 |
||