| 000 | 01994cam a2200349 a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | EG-GiCUC | ||
| 005 | 20250223031523.0 | ||
| 008 | 160619s2015 ua o f m 000 0 eng d | ||
| 040 |
_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC |
||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 049 | _aDeposite | ||
| 097 | _aM.Sc | ||
| 099 | _aCai01.09.13.M.Sc.2015.He.L | ||
| 100 | 0 | _aHend Bahgat Mahmoud Thabt | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aLow level laser therapy in the treatment of temporomandibular joint pain : _bA double blind study / _cHend Bahgat Mahmoud ; Supervised Hamida Refai , Nermine Hassanin , Ahmed Abbas Zaki |
| 246 | 1 | 5 |
_aتأثير الليزر منخفض الشدة فى علاج آلام المفصل الفكى الصدغى : _bدراسة مزدوجة التعمية |
| 260 |
_aCairo : _bHend Bahgat Mahmoud Thabt , _c2015 |
||
| 300 |
_a79 P. : _bphotographs ; _c25cm |
||
| 502 | _aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery | ||
| 520 | _aWas t evaluate the effectiveness of low level laser therapy for the control of TMJ pain. Materials and Methods: This study included 12 patients with clinical diagnosis of DDWR in a random and double blind research design. Patients, divided into study group and control ( placebo) group submitted to treatment with LLL using Ga - As diode laser. Study group received 3 sessions per week during 4 consecutive weeks while placebo group received inactive laser using the same technique and schedule as study group. Results: There were not statistically significant differences between both groups | ||
| 530 | _aIssued also as CD | ||
| 653 | 4 | _aLaser therapy | |
| 653 | 4 | _aLow intensity laser therapy | |
| 653 | 4 | _aTemporomandibular joint pain | |
| 700 | 0 |
_aAhmed Abbas Zaki , _eSupervisor |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aHamida Refai , _eSupervisor |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aNermine Hassanin , _eSupervisor |
|
| 856 | _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf | ||
| 905 |
_aNazla _eRevisor |
||
| 905 |
_aSamia _eCataloger |
||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cTH |
||
| 999 |
_c56972 _d56972 |
||