| 000 | 03098cam a2200337 a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | EG-GiCUC | ||
| 005 | 20250223031551.0 | ||
| 008 | 160929s2015 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d | ||
| 040 |
_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC |
||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 049 | _aDeposite | ||
| 097 | _aM.Sc | ||
| 099 | _aCai01.09.03.M.Sc.2015.Do.M | ||
| 100 | 0 | _aDoaa Abdelaziz Shokry | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aMicroshear bond strength of glass-ionomer restoratives to normal and caries-affected dentin / _cDoaa Abdelaziz Shokry ; Supervised Enas Hussein Mobarak , Heba Ahmed Abdelwanis Eldeeb |
| 246 | 1 | 5 | _aقوة الربط الميكروقصية لترميمات الزجاج الايونمر لركائز العاج الطبيعى و المتأثر بالتسوس |
| 260 |
_aCairo : _bDoaa Abdelaziz Shokry , _c2015 |
||
| 300 |
_a76 P. : _bcharts , facsimiles ; _c25cm |
||
| 502 | _aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Operative Dentistry | ||
| 520 | _aIntroduction: This study was carried out to evaluate the microshear bond strength of two types of high viscous glass-ionomer restorative materials (conventional and filler modified) bonded to normal and caries-affected dentin.Results: Two-way ANOVA revealed no statistical significant difference between the two glass-ionomer restorations values [(Fuji IX GP; High viscous glass-ionomer) and (ChemFil Rock; Filler modified glass-ionomer)] (P= 0.06), and dentin substrates (normal and caries-affected dentin) (P= 0.32), as well as the interaction between the variables (materials and dentin substrates) was not statistically significant (P= 0.08). There was no statistical significant difference among the mean microshear bond strength values of the Fuji IX GP and ChemFil Rock glass-ionomer restoration bonded to both substrates (P= 0.07). For specimens of the Fuji IX GP glass-ionomer restoration bonded to normal and caries-affected dentin, the fractured specimens were mostly adhesive failure at dentin followed by mixed failure (adhesive at dentin side/cohesive failure in glass-ionomer restoration). While in the ChemFil Rock glass-ionomer restoration bonded to normal and caries-affected dentin, the fractured specimens were mostly mixed failure (adhesive failure at dentin side/cohesive in the adhesive layer/cohesive in cement) Conclusion: Under the conditions of this study, the following conclusions were drawn: 1.Filler modified glass-ionomer did not surpass the conventional high viscous glass-ionomer with regarding to the bond strength to both normal and caries-affected dentin. 2. Difference in dentin substrates (normal and caries-affected dentin) did not influence the bond strength of any of the tested glass-ionomer cements | ||
| 530 | _aIssued also as CD | ||
| 653 | 4 | _aChemFil Rock | |
| 653 | 4 | _aFuji IX | |
| 653 | 4 | _aGlass Ionomer | |
| 700 | 0 |
_aEnas Hussein Mobarak , _eSupervisor |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aHeba Ahmed Abdelwanis Eldeeb , _eSupervisor |
|
| 856 | _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf | ||
| 905 |
_aNazla _eRevisor |
||
| 905 |
_aSoheir _eCataloger |
||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cTH |
||
| 999 |
_c57891 _d57891 |
||