| 000 | 02983cam a2200337 a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | EG-GiCUC | ||
| 005 | 20250223031555.0 | ||
| 008 | 170110s2015 ua do f m 000 0 eng d | ||
| 040 |
_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC |
||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 049 | _aDeposite | ||
| 097 | _aM.Sc | ||
| 099 | _aCai01.09.13.M.Sc.2015.Mo.C | ||
| 100 | 0 | _aMostafa Ahmed Mostafa Elmasry | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aComparative study between hemi hydrated calcium sulphate and plasma rich fibrin-prf in socket bone preservation after extraction : _bclinical and 3D cone beam volumetric study / _cMostafa Ahmed Mostafa El Masry ; Supervised Mohamed El Hadidy , Yasser Nabil Helmy |
| 246 | 1 | 5 |
_aدراسه مقارنه بين كبريتات الكالسيوم النصف مهدرج والبلازما الغنية بالفايبرين في الأحتفاظ بكمية العظام عقب الخلع : _bدراسة سريرية مع أستخدام الأشعة المقطعية المخروطية لدراسة الأبعاد الثلاثية لحخم عظام الفك |
| 260 |
_aCairo : _bMostafa Ahmed Mostafa Elmasry , _c2015 |
||
| 300 |
_a139 P. : _bcharts , photographs ; _c25cm |
||
| 502 | _aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery | ||
| 520 | _aPatients and Mehods: 26 patients were treatment planned for extraction of mandibular anterior teeth, leaving 72 sockets for the study. Sockets were divided into 3 groups, each group consisting of 24 sockets. Sockets were grafted as follows: Group (A) sockets were grafted with calcium sulfate, Group (B) sockets were grafted with PRF and Group (C) sockets without graft as a control group. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) were done immediately and 3 months postoperatively, then collected data were statistically analyzed. Results: After 3 months, Bone height (mm) showed significant difference between the tested groups where Group A (CaSO4.1/2H2O) produced the highest mean Bone height followed by Group B (PRF) and Group C (Control) respectively. Bone width (mm) showed insignificant differences between the tested groups. Bone density showed insignificant differences between the tested groups. Conclusion: (1) CASO4 showed superior outcome as a graft material in extraction sockets. (2)PRF may represent a simple and effective means of accelerating new bone growth without use of barrier membranes or exogenous thrombin associated with other PRP systems. (3) Socket preservation may aid in reducing the bone dimensional changes following tooth extraction. However, they do not prevent bone resorption | ||
| 530 | _aIssued also as CD | ||
| 653 | 4 | _aCalcium sulfate | |
| 653 | 4 | _aPlatelet rich fibrin (PRF) | |
| 653 | 4 | _aSocket preservation | |
| 700 | 0 |
_aMohamed Elhadidy , _eSupervisor |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aYasser Nabil Helmy , _eSupervisor |
|
| 856 | _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf | ||
| 905 |
_aEnas _eCataloger |
||
| 905 |
_aNazla _eRevisor |
||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cTH |
||
| 999 |
_c58022 _d58022 |
||