000 03376cam a2200337 a 4500
003 EG-GiCUC
005 20250223031652.0
008 170220s2016 ua dho f m 000 0 eng d
040 _aEG-GiCUC
_beng
_cEG-GiCUC
041 0 _aeng
049 _aDeposite
097 _aM.Sc
099 _aCai01.09.05.M.Sc.2016.Em.I
100 0 _aEman Mamdouh Mohamed
245 1 0 _aIn vitro assessment of recurrent caries and radiodensity of restorative materials using cone beam computed tomography and intra oral digital radiography :
_bDiagnostic study /
_cEman Mamdouh Mohamed ; Supervised Mushira Mohamed Dahaba , Ahmad M. AbdAlsamad
246 1 5 _aتقييم مختبرى لنخر الأسنان الراجع والكثافة الإشعاعية للمواد الترميمية باستخدام الأشعة المقطعية بالحاسوب مخروطية الشعاع والتصوير الشعاعى الرقمي داخل الفموى :
_bدراسة تشخيصية
260 _aCairo :
_bEman Mamdouh Mohamed ,
_c2016
300 _a166 P. :
_bcharts , facsimiles , photographs ;
_c25cm
502 _aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Oral ( Radiology and Diagnosis )
520 _aThirty six human teeth were selected and a mesio-occluso-distal cavity (MOD) was prepared in each tooth and a round depression was prepared in the gingival floor of only one proximal box to simulate recurrent caries. The prepared teeth were divided equally and randomly into three groups according to final restorative material placed in the prepared cavity (12 teeth per group). The first group was restored with amalgam filling material ,the second with composite filling material ,and the third with ionomer filling material . Every tooth in the three groups was imaged by digital periapical radiography and CBCT. The resultant images were assessed for detection of simulated recurrent caries and radio-density of different restorations in relation to tooth structure Results: DDR was more accurate than CBCT in detection of caries under amalgam restoration. For composite restoration we found that DDR and axial CBCT images had higher accuracy than cross section CBCT images. While for glassionomer restored teeth, the axial and cross section CBCT images were more accurate than DDR. Using kappa to show inter observer agreement, there was statistically significant agreement range (0.39-1.00) between the two observers in detection of simulated recurrent caries under different restoration by using digital periapical radiograph, CBCT axial and CBCT cross sectional images. The difference in density between tooth structure and dental restorative materials in CBCT was very close regarding composite and amalgam restorations while for glass ionomer it was lower than them. In digital periapical radiography, the difference in density was highest in amalgam restorations followed by the composite restored teeth, while the lowest was in glassionomer restoration
530 _aIssued also as CD
653 4 _aCBCT
653 4 _aIntra oral digital radiography
653 4 _aRecurrent caries
700 0 _aAhmad Mohamed AbdAlsamad ,
_eSupervisor
700 0 _aMushira Mohamed Dahaba ,
_eSupervisor
856 _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905 _aEnas
_eCataloger
905 _aNazla
_eRevisor
942 _2ddc
_cTH
999 _c59917
_d59917